Bug #956
closed
obsync: preserve ACLs when doing bucket to bucket transfers
Added by Colin McCabe about 13 years ago.
Updated about 13 years ago.
Description
Should we preserve ACLs when doing bucket to bucket transfers? Probably.
I'm not sure how we should handle ACLs when doing bucket-to-file transfers. They could be stashed in extended attributes.
- this should be an option, probably p (and implied by -a) to be consistent with rsync and cp
for files, yea, we can store it in an xattr. maybe the bucket acl can be an xattr on the directory.
I think the goal should be for '-a' (or whatever) to make a backup that will completely backup and restore the objects and their permissions.
- Target version set to v0.28
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- Target version changed from v0.28 to v0.27
- Translation missing: en.field_story_points set to 2
- Translation missing: en.field_position set to 1
- Translation missing: en.field_position changed from 1 to 631
Also available in: Atom
PDF