Actions
Bug #837
closedAuthAuthorizeHandler fails to build on s390
% Done:
0%
Source:
Tags:
Backport:
Regression:
Severity:
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Pull request ID:
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):
Description
Also from Laszlo:
It also fails on s390, on the same file but with a different error message: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wall -D__CEPH__ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_REENTRANT -D_THREAD_SAFE -rdynamic -g -O2 -MT AuthAuthorizeHandler.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/AuthAuthorizeHandler.Tpo -c -o AuthAuthorizeHandler.o `test -f 'auth/AuthAuthorizeHandler.cc' || echo './'`auth/AuthAuthorizeHandler.cc In file included from ./msg/msg_types.h:19, from auth/Auth.h:19, from auth/AuthAuthorizeHandler.cc:1: ./include/blobhash.h: In member function 'size_t blobhash::operator()(const char*, unsigned int)': ./include/blobhash.h:42: error: no match for call to '(rjhash<long unsigned int>) (size_t&)' make[3]: *** [AuthAuthorizeHandler.o] Error 1 The full building log can be found on the same location[2]. I would be grateful if someone with more knowledge of Ceph internals can look into them. Regards, Laszlo/GCS [1] https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=ceph&arch=armel&ver=0.24.3-2&stamp=1298712439&file=log&as=raw [2] https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=ceph&arch=s390&ver=0.24.3-2&stamp=1298712185&file=log&as=raw
Updated by Sage Weil about 13 years ago
- Target version changed from v0.25 to v0.25.1
Updated by Anonymous about 13 years ago
Current understanding:
it's the key hashing function for an in-RAM hash table
Plan:
rewrite hash table to use rjhash* directly, avoid size_t in favor of u_int32_t etc
remove blobhash from source tree
Will fix next week.
Updated by Sage Weil about 13 years ago
- Target version changed from v0.25.1 to v0.25.2
Updated by Sage Weil about 13 years ago
- Translation missing: en.field_story_points set to 3
- Translation missing: en.field_position set to 554
Updated by Sage Weil about 13 years ago
- Translation missing: en.field_position deleted (
554) - Translation missing: en.field_position set to 552
Updated by Anonymous about 13 years ago
There's a stab in the dark that might solve this in branch tv-blobhash-837.
Updated by Sage Weil about 13 years ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- Target version changed from v0.25.2 to v0.26
merging this for v0.26 to get some extra testing. no rush on s390 support :)
Updated by Sage Weil about 13 years ago
- Translation missing: en.field_position deleted (
574) - Translation missing: en.field_position set to 573
Updated by Sage Weil about 13 years ago
- Translation missing: en.field_story_points changed from 3 to 1
- Translation missing: en.field_position deleted (
573) - Translation missing: en.field_position set to 573
Actions