Bug #63672
closed
in the above test, lua-devel is found for:
are we positive that lua-devel
is a runtime dependency? did you try without and see failures? i don't understand why luarocks
only lists lua
as a dependency if it needs -devel
also
- Blocks deleted (Bug #63616: lua integration tests)
are we positive that lua-devel is a runtime dependency?
luarocks compile the packages, so it needs lua.h which comes with lua-devel
did you try without and see failures?
yes
i don't understand why luarocks only lists lua as a dependency if it needs -devel also
because it is not luarocks itself that depends on that. it what it does with the packages
luarocks is pure lua code, just need lua. but when it compiles a lua package that has C code in it (not all of them has), it needs lua.h
the #sepia folks haven't figured out how to enable this repo yet. if that can't be resolved in a timely manner, we could prepare a temporary revert for the lua-devel dependency. that would break the rgw/lua tests, but unblock testing on rhel
- Status changed from New to Fix Under Review
- Pull request ID set to 54789
- Status changed from Fix Under Review to Resolved
from #sepia thread:
Dan Mick: so I think I finally enabled the repo for rhel8 hosts
Dan Mick: the "proper" way to fix this would be to recapture the fog image; I'll work on that next
- Has duplicate Bug #63788: Cephadm tests fail from "nothing provides lua-devel needed by ceph-2:19.0.0-44.g2d90d175.el8.x86_64" added
another update from #sepia slack:
rhel8.6 jobs should work now, and allow installing lua-devel
Also available in: Atom
PDF