Ceph

Could be related to #14236

Run: http://pulpito.ovh.sepia.ceph.com:8081/teuthology-2016-01-07_21:00:01-rados-hammer-distro-basic-openstack/
Job: 62653
Logs: http://teuthology.ovh.sepia.ceph.com/teuthology/teuthology-2016-01-07_21:00:01-rados-hammer-distro-basic-openstack/62653/teuthology.log

2016-01-08T00:33:07.905 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.target087097.stdout:7254:  finishing write tid 1 to target087097.ovh.sepia.ceph.com11949-7254
2016-01-08T00:33:07.906 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.target087097.stderr:Error: finished tid 1 when last_acked_tid was 6
2016-01-08T00:33:07.945 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.target087097.stderr:./test/osd/RadosModel.h: In function 'virtual void WriteOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)' thread 7f4271ffb700 time 2016-01-08 00:33:07.779044
2016-01-08T00:33:07.945 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.target087097.stderr:./test/osd/RadosModel.h: 854: FAILED assert(0)
2016-01-08T00:33:07.947 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.target087097.stderr: ceph version 0.94.5-178-g9739d4d (9739d4de49f8167866eda556b2f1581c068ec8a7)
2016-01-08T00:33:07.948 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.target087097.stderr: 1: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char const*)+0x8b) [0x4e05fb]
2016-01-08T00:33:07.953 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.target087097.stderr: 2: (WriteOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)+0x46e) [0x4c83ae]
2016-01-08T00:33:07.953 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.target087097.stderr: 3: (write_callback(void*, void*)+0x19) [0x4d7bf9]
2016-01-08T00:33:07.954 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.target087097.stderr: 4: (()+0xb4b7d) [0x7f427fdbbb7d]
2016-01-08T00:33:07.955 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.target087097.stderr: 5: (()+0x900c9) [0x7f427fd970c9]
2016-01-08T00:33:07.956 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.target087097.stderr: 6: (()+0x1544c8) [0x7f427fe5b4c8]
2016-01-08T00:33:07.956 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.target087097.stderr: 7: (()+0x8182) [0x7f427f8db182]
2016-01-08T00:33:07.956 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.target087097.stderr: 8: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f427e26047d]
2016-01-08T00:33:07.957 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.target087097.stderr: NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is needed to interpret this.