https://tracker.ceph.com/
https://tracker.ceph.com/favicon.ico
2016-01-08T17:40:52Z
Ceph
Ceph - Bug #14306: "RadosModel.h: 854: FAILED assert(0)" in rados-hammer-distro-basic-openstack
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14306?journal_id=63777
2016-01-08T17:40:52Z
Yuri Weinstein
yweinste@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Description</strong> updated (<a title="View differences" href="/journals/63777/diff?detail_id=61276">diff</a>)</li></ul>
Ceph - Bug #14306: "RadosModel.h: 854: FAILED assert(0)" in rados-hammer-distro-basic-openstack
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14306?journal_id=63779
2016-01-08T17:43:37Z
Yuri Weinstein
yweinste@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Project</strong> changed from <i>rbd</i> to <i>Ceph</i></li></ul>
Ceph - Bug #14306: "RadosModel.h: 854: FAILED assert(0)" in rados-hammer-distro-basic-openstack
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14306?journal_id=63780
2016-01-08T17:44:09Z
Yuri Weinstein
yweinste@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Related to</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-9 status-3 priority-6 priority-high2 closed" href="/issues/14236">Backport #14236</a>: "OSDMonitor.cc: 2116: FAILED assert(0)" in rados-hammer-distro-basic-openstack</i> added</li></ul>
Ceph - Bug #14306: "RadosModel.h: 854: FAILED assert(0)" in rados-hammer-distro-basic-openstack
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14306?journal_id=63785
2016-01-08T18:21:01Z
Samuel Just
sjust@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Related to</strong> deleted (<i><a class="issue tracker-9 status-3 priority-6 priority-high2 closed" href="/issues/14236">Backport #14236</a>: "OSDMonitor.cc: 2116: FAILED assert(0)" in rados-hammer-distro-basic-openstack</i>)</li></ul>
Ceph - Bug #14306: "RadosModel.h: 854: FAILED assert(0)" in rados-hammer-distro-basic-openstack
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14306?journal_id=63787
2016-01-08T18:25:51Z
Samuel Just
sjust@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Duplicates</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-1 status-9 priority-6 priority-high2 closed" href="/issues/12814">Bug #12814</a>: flipping the overlay from forward to seems to reorder writes</i> added</li></ul>
Ceph - Bug #14306: "RadosModel.h: 854: FAILED assert(0)" in rados-hammer-distro-basic-openstack
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14306?journal_id=63789
2016-01-08T18:26:05Z
Samuel Just
sjust@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Duplicate</i></li></ul>
Ceph - Bug #14306: "RadosModel.h: 854: FAILED assert(0)" in rados-hammer-distro-basic-openstack
https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/14306?journal_id=65136
2016-02-02T17:08:15Z
Yuri Weinstein
yweinste@redhat.com
<ul></ul><p>Run: <a class="external" href="http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2016-02-01_09:00:02-rados-hammer-distro-basic-vps/">http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2016-02-01_09:00:02-rados-hammer-distro-basic-vps/</a><br />Job: ['43']</p>
<pre>
WriteOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)' thread 7f873e1c0700 time 2016-02-01 20:31:50.240676
2016-02-01T12:31:50.778 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.vpm072.stderr:./test/osd/RadosModel.h: 854: FAILED assert(0)
2016-02-01T12:31:50.778 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.vpm072.stderr: ceph version 0.94.5-290-g2c8e579 (2c8e57934284dae0ae92d1aa0839a87092ec7c51)
2016-02-01T12:31:50.779 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.vpm072.stderr: 1: (ceph::__ceph_assert_fail(char const*, char const*, int, char const*)+0x8b) [0x4e05fb]
2016-02-01T12:31:50.779 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.vpm072.stderr: 2: (WriteOp::_finish(TestOp::CallbackInfo*)+0x46e) [0x4c83ae]
2016-02-01T12:31:50.779 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.vpm072.stderr: 3: (write_callback(void*, void*)+0x19) [0x4d7bf9]
2016-02-01T12:31:50.779 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.vpm072.stderr: 4: (()+0x94ced) [0x7f87464ffced]
2016-02-01T12:31:50.780 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.vpm072.stderr: 5: (()+0x70019) [0x7f87464db019]
2016-02-01T12:31:50.780 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.vpm072.stderr: 6: (()+0x134638) [0x7f874659f638]
2016-02-01T12:31:50.780 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.vpm072.stderr: 7: (()+0x8182) [0x7f874603f182]
2016-02-01T12:31:50.780 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.vpm072.stderr: 8: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f87449c447d]
2016-02-01T12:31:50.781 INFO:tasks.rados.rados.0.vpm072.stderr: NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS <executable>` is needed to interpret this.
</pre>