Bug #10863: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: cephfs_jni (Not found in java.library.path) on RHEL7 - CephFS - Ceph

Custom queries

Bug queue
Bug triage
CephFS Bug Triage
CephFS task-easy
CephFS: Available Easy Issues
CephFS: Documentation
Crash queue
Crash triage
Feedback
My issues
Need Review
Pending backports
Product Backlog Scrub
Quincy Backports
Release: Quincy: Backports (open)
Release: Reef: Backports (open)
Release: Squid: Backports (open)
Release: Squid: Features
Release: Squid: Open Issues
Release: Tentacle: Features
Release: Tentacle: Open Issues
Zee CephFS Ticket Well

Actions

Copy link

Bug #10863

closed

java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: cephfs_jni (Not found in java.library.path) on RHEL7

Added by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago. Updated about 9 years ago.

Status:

Resolved

Priority:

Normal

Assignee:

Noah Watkins

Category:

Target version:

% Done:

Source:

Q/A

Tags:

Backport:

firefly

Regression:

Severity:

3 - minor

Reviewed:

Affected Versions:

ceph-qa-suite:

Component(FS):

Labels (FS):

Pull request ID:

Crash signature (v1):

Crash signature (v2):

Description

http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/teuthology-2015-02-06_23:04:01-fs-giant-distro-basic-magna/42028/
http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/teuthology-2015-02-09_23:04:02-fs-giant-distro-basic-magna/44005/

Presumably we need to update that java.library.path or something, because the libcephfs_jni package is installed. Or maybe it's trying to grab the wrong filename...

History
Notes
Property changes

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago

Priority changed from Normal to High

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago

http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/teuthology-2015-02-16_23:04:01-fs-giant-distro-basic-magna/48617/

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago

This persists as an issue; we really need to grab the time to look at it. :(

http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-02-23_23:04:03-fs-master-testing-basic-multi/776842/

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago

Assignee set to Noah Watkins

Here Noah, catch! :)

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago

Status changed from New to Pending Backport
Assignee changed from Noah Watkins to Greg Farnum

Okay, I forget whether it was https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3782 or https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/pull/340 specifically, but we need to backport these eventually.

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago

Priority changed from High to Urgent

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago

Assignee changed from Greg Farnum to Noah Watkins

Noah's started working on the backports too.

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Noah Watkins about 9 years ago

Greg Farnum wrote:

Noah's started working on the backports too.

I think this ticket is resolved since my last PR for RHEL stuff. Is there a related ticket for backports, or just combine them?

Actions

Copy link

Updated by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago

They go on the same ticket, thus the "Pending Backport" state. :)

Actions

Copy link

#10

Updated by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago

Hammer backports are in (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3877 and https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/pull/363), but I think firefly is also busted? Not certain though.

Actions

Copy link

#11

Updated by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago

Status changed from Pending Backport to 12

Okay, this bug has revived itself on master as well: http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/teuthology-2015-03-16_23:04:02-fs-master-testing-basic-multi/807278/. I'm not sure if something else changed in the configuration or what, am asking around...

Actions

Copy link

#12

Updated by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago

It passed on hammer on a trusty host: http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-03-17_23:04:02-fs-hammer-testing-basic-multi/808875/

Whereas the failure in the last comment was RHEL7. I thought the different distro issues had all been worked out but maybe that's the issue.

Actions

Copy link

#13

Updated by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago

Well, here we are on master with a trusty failure. I'm so confused. :(

http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-03-20_23:04:02-fs-master-testing-basic-multi/814833/

Actions

Copy link

#14

Updated by Noah Watkins about 9 years ago

Greg Farnum wrote:

Well, here we are on master with a trusty failure. I'm so confused. :(

http://pulpito.ceph.com/teuthology-2015-03-20_23:04:02-fs-master-testing-basic-multi/814833/

This seems different, but its confusing because that code hasn't changed since 2012... i'll try to reproduce. New bug added here http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11258

Actions

Copy link

#15

Updated by Noah Watkins about 9 years ago

The JNI bits are landing in /usr/lib64 on RHEL but the qa workunit only has debian paths added to the library search paths.

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4209

Actions

Copy link

#16

Updated by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago

Status changed from 12 to 7
Backport set to giant, firefly, dumpling

Merged and marked for backport (to firefly definitely, plus dumpling and giant if we're still running tests against them).

Actions

Copy link

#17

Updated by Noah Watkins about 9 years ago

This should resolve the native library problem on RHEL (tested on plana64/Rhel7). There are still backports needed for ceph-qa-suite on firefly/dumpling.

Actions

Copy link

#18

Updated by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago

Is that just commit:6a348ae1870eb4e22a35f4ea86d897fb6d960b88 ("hadoop: fixup for new replication test")?

Actions

Copy link

#19

Updated by Loïc Dachary about 9 years ago

Backport changed from giant, firefly, dumpling to giant, firefly

There no longer are backports to dumpling Unless this problem could cause problems for people upgrading from giant, there is no need to backport.

Actions

Copy link

#20

Updated by Greg Farnum about 9 years ago

Status changed from 7 to Pending Backport
Priority changed from Urgent to Normal

This seems to be working on hammer/master; we'll probably just turn this off on the older branches since nobody should be running it against them at this point anyway.

Actions

Copy link

#21