Ceph » RADOS

Found a similar instance here:

/a/lflores-2022-09-30_21:47:41-rados-wip-lflores-testing-distro-default-smithi/7050789

<error>
  <unique>0x1e49c46</unique>
  <tid>1</tid>
  <kind>Leak_PossiblyLost</kind>
  <xwhat>
    <text>32 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 434 of 1,263</text>
    <leakedbytes>32</leakedbytes>
    <leakedblocks>1</leakedblocks>
  </xwhat>
  <stack>
    <frame>
      <ip>0x4C3BE4B</ip>
      <obj>/usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so</obj>
      <fn>calloc</fn>
      <dir>/builddir/build/BUILD/valgrind-3.19.0/coregrind/m_replacemalloc</dir>
      <file>vg_replace_malloc.c</file>
      <line>1328</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <ip>0xA9976E5</ip>
      <obj>/usr/lib64/libnl-3.so.200.26.0</obj>
      <fn>__trans_list_add</fn>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <ip>0xA7102AC</ip>
      <obj>/usr/lib64/libnl-route-3.so.200.26.0</obj>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <ip>0x4009059</ip>
      <obj>/usr/lib64/ld-2.28.so</obj>
      <fn>call_init.part.0</fn>
      <dir>/usr/src/debug/glibc-2.28-211.el8.x86_64/elf</dir>
      <file>dl-init.c</file>
      <line>72</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <ip>0x4009159</ip>
      <obj>/usr/lib64/ld-2.28.so</obj>
      <fn>call_init</fn>
      <dir>/usr/src/debug/glibc-2.28-211.el8.x86_64/elf</dir>
      <file>dl-init.c</file>
      <line>118</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <ip>0x4009159</ip>
      <obj>/usr/lib64/ld-2.28.so</obj>
      <fn>_dl_init</fn>
      <dir>/usr/src/debug/glibc-2.28-211.el8.x86_64/elf</dir>
      <file>dl-init.c</file>
      <line>119</line>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <ip>0x401D989</ip>
      <obj>/usr/lib64/ld-2.28.so</obj>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <ip>0x5</ip>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <ip>0x1FFF000C1E</ip>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <ip>0x1FFF000C27</ip>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <ip>0x1FFF000C2A</ip>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <ip>0x1FFF000C34</ip>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <ip>0x1FFF000C39</ip>
    </frame>
    <frame>
      <ip>0x1FFF000C3C</ip>
    </frame>
  </stack>
</error>

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/48641 merged

Laura, the original PR was for quincy. And the related tracker https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/57618 already have backport new trackers (yesterday) so i'll change the status to In progress for that tracker as well and continue with the exists backport trackers

Thanks Nitzan!

Sounds like a missed backport. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Radoslaw Zarzynski wrote:

Sounds like a missed backport. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

That's my understanding as well.

The pacific backport has been approved and is just awaiting testing: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/49521