Bug #62482
closedqa: "cluster [WRN] Health check failed: 1 pool(s) do not have an application enabled (POOL_APP_NOT_ENABLED)"
0%
Description
/teuthology/vshankar-2023-08-16_10:55:44-fs-wip-vshankar-testing-20230816.054905-testing-default-smithi/7369639/teuthology.log
and many others.
2023-08-16T11:24:28.206+0000 7f5f46e5d640 20 mon.a@0(leader).mgrstat health checks: { "POOL_APP_NOT_ENABLED": { "severity": "HEALTH_WARN", "summary": { "message": "1 pool(s) do not have an application enabled", "count": 1 }, "detail": [ { "message": "application not enabled on pool 'rbd'" }, { "message": "use 'ceph osd pool application enable <pool-name> <app-name>', where <app-name> is 'cephfs', 'rbd', 'rgw', or freeform for custom applications." } ] } }
Updated by Patrick Donnelly 9 months ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Fix Under Review
- Pull request ID set to 53037
Updated by Patrick Donnelly 8 months ago
- Has duplicate Bug #62508: qa: Health check failed: 1 pool(s) do not have an application enabled (POOL_APP_NOT_ENABLED)" in cluster log added
Updated by Venky Shankar 8 months ago
- Status changed from Fix Under Review to Pending Backport
Updated by Backport Bot 8 months ago
- Copied to Backport #62695: quincy: qa: "cluster [WRN] Health check failed: 1 pool(s) do not have an application enabled (POOL_APP_NOT_ENABLED)" added
Updated by Backport Bot 8 months ago
- Copied to Backport #62696: reef: qa: "cluster [WRN] Health check failed: 1 pool(s) do not have an application enabled (POOL_APP_NOT_ENABLED)" added
Updated by Venky Shankar 8 months ago
Revert change: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/53331
Updated by Venky Shankar 8 months ago
Additional PR: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/53418
Updated by Patrick Donnelly 8 months ago
- Status changed from Pending Backport to Resolved
Canceling backports since this doesn't fix the issue.
Updated by Venky Shankar 8 months ago
Patrick Donnelly wrote:
Canceling backports since this doesn't fix the issue.
Patrick, the fixes that add the warning to ignorelist need backporting, isn't it?
Updated by Patrick Donnelly 8 months ago
Venky Shankar wrote:
Patrick Donnelly wrote:
Canceling backports since this doesn't fix the issue.
Patrick, the fixes that add the warning to ignorelist need backporting, isn't it?
Yes, and IMHO Prashant needs to add all of the ignorelist additions and combine them in his backport.
Updated by Nitzan Mordechai 4 months ago
/a/yuriw-2023-12-26_16:04:49-rados-wip-yuri5-testing-2023-12-15-0747-pacific-distro-default-smithi/7501384
/a/yuriw-2023-12-26_16:04:49-rados-wip-yuri5-testing-2023-12-15-0747-pacific-distro-default-smithi/7501353
/a/yuriw-2023-12-26_16:04:49-rados-wip-yuri5-testing-2023-12-15-0747-pacific-distro-default-smithi/7501338
Updated by Nitzan Mordechai 4 months ago
/a/yuriw-2023-12-27_21:01:10-rados-wip-yuri7-testing-2023-12-27-1008-pacific-distro-default-smithi/7502419