Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #18885

closed

rgw: data sync of versioned objects, note updating bi marker

Added by Yehuda Sadeh about 7 years ago. Updated almost 6 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
High
Assignee:
Target version:
-
% Done:

0%

Source:
Tags:
Backport:
luminous, jewel
Regression:
No
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Pull request ID:
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):

Description

This happens because the unlink_instance has a higher mtime than the del object operation (that happens later), so when squashing the ops we skip the second operations. The object removal on the target already happens, but we don't update the high marker when dealing with squashed entries.


Related issues 2 (0 open2 closed)

Copied to rgw - Backport #23025: luminous: rgw: data sync of versioned objects, note updating bi markerResolvedNathan CutlerActions
Copied to rgw - Backport #23026: jewel: rgw: data sync of versioned objects, note updating bi markerResolvedNathan CutlerActions
Actions #1

Updated by Yehuda Sadeh about 7 years ago

  • Backport set to kraken, jewel
Actions #2

Updated by Nathan Cutler about 7 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Fix Under Review
  • Assignee set to Yehuda Sadeh
Actions #3

Updated by Ken Dreyer over 6 years ago

  • Backport changed from kraken, jewel to luminous, jewel
Actions #4

Updated by Yehuda Sadeh over 6 years ago

  • Priority changed from Normal to High
Actions #5

Updated by Casey Bodley over 6 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Yehuda Sadeh to Casey Bodley
Actions #6

Updated by Orit Wasserman about 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Fix Under Review to Pending Backport
Actions #7

Updated by Nathan Cutler about 6 years ago

  • Copied to Backport #23025: luminous: rgw: data sync of versioned objects, note updating bi marker added
Actions #8

Updated by Nathan Cutler about 6 years ago

  • Copied to Backport #23026: jewel: rgw: data sync of versioned objects, note updating bi marker added
Actions #9

Updated by Nathan Cutler about 6 years ago

I'm assuming this [1] is the PR to be backported.

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/20016

Actions #10

Updated by Casey Bodley about 6 years ago

Nathan Cutler wrote:

I'm assuming this [1] is the PR to be backported.

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/20016

right! thanks

Actions #11

Updated by Nathan Cutler almost 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending Backport to Resolved
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF