Actions
Bug #8256
closedunhelpful ceph cli command --help
% Done:
0%
Source:
Development
Tags:
Backport:
Regression:
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Pull request ID:
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):
Description
The usage on the left says <poolname> everywhere not making it clear where to put the <tierpool> name from the descriptions on the right.
osd tier add <poolname> <poolname> {-- add the tier <tierpool> to base pool
force-nonempty} <pool>
osd tier add-cache <poolname> add a cache <tierpool> of size <size>
<poolname> <int[0-]> to existing pool <pool>
osd tier cache-mode <poolname> none| specify the caching mode for cache
writeback|forward|readonly tier <pool>
osd tier remove <poolname> <poolname> remove the tier <tierpool> from base
pool <pool>
osd tier remove-overlay <poolname> remove the overlay pool for base pool
<pool>
osd tier set-overlay <poolname> set the overlay pool for base pool
<poolname> <pool> to be <overlaypool>
Updated by Sage Weil almost 10 years ago
- Subject changed from unhelpful ceph command --help to unhelpful ceph cli command --help
- Status changed from New to 12
- Assignee set to Dan Mick
- Source changed from other to Development
Updated by Dan Mick almost 10 years ago
Yeah, I debated about "parametername" vs "type" being more helpful. Of course, always, everyone wants both, and then the help message becomes quite verbose; it was workable before we added tiering.
sigh.
Actions