Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #8186

closed

No package ceph-fuse-0.79 available.

Added by Alfredo Deza about 10 years ago. Updated almost 10 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Sandon Van Ness
Category:
-
% Done:

0%

Source:
Q/A
Tags:
Backport:
Regression:
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):

Description

ceph-deploy tests are failing because it can't find version 0.79 of ceph-fuse on CentOS/RHEL repos.

Example log file: http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/teuthology-2014-04-23_01:10:22-ceph-deploy-firefly-distro-basic-vps/210690/teuthology.log

Actions #1

Updated by Yuri Weinstein about 10 years ago

Same problems for upgrade:dumpling-x:stress-split-firefly-distro-basic-vps suites, examples log is here - http://qa-proxy.ceph.com/teuthology/teuthology-2014-04-22_20:35:03-upgrade:dumpling-x:stress-split-firefly-distro-basic-vps/210282/teuthology.log

Actions #2

Updated by Sandon Van Ness about 10 years ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress

This was caused by the fact that:

http://gitbuilder.ceph.com/ceph-rpm-centos6-x86_64-basic/sha1/6769f4dc88425396921f94e1a37a1c90758aa3ea/version

Lists the version as 0.79 but the actual files are 0.80-rc1. I am not sure if this is because weirdness with the v0.80-rc1 tag/branch that was pushed out which happens to be the same sha1 as the firefly branch (which probably built later) and subsequent builds of the firefly dev branch won't have this issue.

Leaving open for now and forcing a rebuild of the firefly branch to see if this is still happening.

Actions #3

Updated by Sandon Van Ness about 10 years ago

I think we are going to need to have something new comitted to the firefly branch so the v0.80-rc1 branch and 'firefly' branch have different sha1's before this issue goes away.

Actions #4

Updated by Sandon Van Ness almost 10 years ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Closed
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF