Project

General

Profile

Bug #59531

quincy: "OSD bench result of 228617.361065 IOPS exceeded the threshold limit of 500.000000 IOPS for osd.7. IOPS capacity is unchanged at 315.000000 IOPS. The recommendation is to establish the osd's IOPS capacity using other benchmark tools (e.g. Fio)"

Added by Patrick Donnelly 10 months ago. Updated 17 days ago.

Status:
Pending Backport
Priority:
Normal
Category:
-
Target version:
-
% Done:

0%

Source:
Q/A
Tags:
backport_processed
Backport:
reef, quincy
Regression:
No
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Component(RADOS):
Pull request ID:
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):

Description

/ceph/teuthology-archive/pdonnell-2023-04-24_17:17:44-fs-wip-pdonnell-testing-20230420.183701-quincy-distro-default-smithi/7249709/teuthology.log

All the test has done so far is start ceph. Should we (fs suite) be setting a config to mute this WRN or is this a bug?


Related issues

Copied to RADOS - Backport #64168: reef: quincy: "OSD bench result of 228617.361065 IOPS exceeded the threshold limit of 500.000000 IOPS for osd.7. IOPS capacity is unchanged at 315.000000 IOPS. The recommendation is to establish the osd's IOPS capacity using other benchmark tools (e.g. Fi New
Copied to RADOS - Backport #64169: quincy: quincy: "OSD bench result of 228617.361065 IOPS exceeded the threshold limit of 500.000000 IOPS for osd.7. IOPS capacity is unchanged at 315.000000 IOPS. The recommendation is to establish the osd's IOPS capacity using other benchmark tools (e.g. New

History

#1 Updated by Radoslaw Zarzynski 10 months ago

  • Assignee set to Aishwarya Mathuria

Hi Aishwarya! What do you think on the Patrick's question: "Should we (fs suite) be setting a config to mute this WRN or is this a bug?"?

#4 Updated by Radoslaw Zarzynski 8 months ago

  • Backport set to reef, quincy

#6 Updated by Aishwarya Mathuria 8 months ago

I think we can ignore the warning but I'll check on the failed tests and update this.

#7 Updated by Radoslaw Zarzynski 8 months ago

Aishwarya is working on that -- note from today's core sync.

#8 Updated by Radoslaw Zarzynski 8 months ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress

#14 Updated by Aishwarya Mathuria about 1 month ago

  • Pull request ID set to 52530

#15 Updated by Aishwarya Mathuria 28 days ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved

#16 Updated by Aishwarya Mathuria 28 days ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Pending Backport

#17 Updated by Backport Bot 28 days ago

  • Copied to Backport #64168: reef: quincy: "OSD bench result of 228617.361065 IOPS exceeded the threshold limit of 500.000000 IOPS for osd.7. IOPS capacity is unchanged at 315.000000 IOPS. The recommendation is to establish the osd's IOPS capacity using other benchmark tools (e.g. Fi added

#18 Updated by Backport Bot 28 days ago

  • Copied to Backport #64169: quincy: quincy: "OSD bench result of 228617.361065 IOPS exceeded the threshold limit of 500.000000 IOPS for osd.7. IOPS capacity is unchanged at 315.000000 IOPS. The recommendation is to establish the osd's IOPS capacity using other benchmark tools (e.g. added

#19 Updated by Backport Bot 28 days ago

  • Tags set to backport_processed

Also available in: Atom PDF