Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Bug #59531

open

quincy: "OSD bench result of 228617.361065 IOPS exceeded the threshold limit of 500.000000 IOPS for osd.7. IOPS capacity is unchanged at 315.000000 IOPS. The recommendation is to establish the osd's IOPS capacity using other benchmark tools (e.g. Fio)"

Added by Patrick Donnelly about 1 year ago. Updated 3 months ago.

Status:
Pending Backport
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Aishwarya Mathuria
Category:
-
Target version:
-
% Done:

0%

Source:
Q/A
Tags:
backport_processed
Backport:
reef, quincy
Regression:
No
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Component(RADOS):
Pull request ID:
52530
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):

Description

/ceph/teuthology-archive/pdonnell-2023-04-24_17:17:44-fs-wip-pdonnell-testing-20230420.183701-quincy-distro-default-smithi/7249709/teuthology.log

All the test has done so far is start ceph. Should we (fs suite) be setting a config to mute this WRN or is this a bug?

Related issues 2 (2 open — 0 closed)

Copied to RADOS - Backport #64168: reef: quincy: "OSD bench result of 228617.361065 IOPS exceeded the threshold limit of 500.000000 IOPS for osd.7. IOPS capacity is unchanged at 315.000000 IOPS. The recommendation is to establish the osd's IOPS capacity using other benchmark tools (e.g. FiNewAishwarya MathuriaActions
Copied to RADOS - Backport #64169: quincy: quincy: "OSD bench result of 228617.361065 IOPS exceeded the threshold limit of 500.000000 IOPS for osd.7. IOPS capacity is unchanged at 315.000000 IOPS. The recommendation is to establish the osd's IOPS capacity using other benchmark tools (e.g. NewAishwarya MathuriaActions
Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Radoslaw Zarzynski about 1 year ago

  • Assignee set to Aishwarya Mathuria

Hi Aishwarya! What do you think on the Patrick's question: "Should we (fs suite) be setting a config to mute this WRN or is this a bug?"?

Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by Radoslaw Zarzynski 11 months ago

  • Backport set to reef, quincy
Actions
Copy link
 #6

Updated by Aishwarya Mathuria 10 months ago

I think we can ignore the warning but I'll check on the failed tests and update this.

Actions
Copy link
 #7

Updated by Radoslaw Zarzynski 10 months ago

Aishwarya is working on that -- note from today's core sync.

Actions
Copy link
 #8

Updated by Radoslaw Zarzynski 10 months ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress
Actions
Copy link
 #14

Updated by Aishwarya Mathuria 4 months ago

  • Pull request ID set to 52530
Actions
Copy link
 #15

Updated by Aishwarya Mathuria 3 months ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
Actions
Copy link
 #16

Updated by Aishwarya Mathuria 3 months ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Pending Backport
Actions
Copy link
 #17

Updated by Backport Bot 3 months ago

  • Copied to Backport #64168: reef: quincy: "OSD bench result of 228617.361065 IOPS exceeded the threshold limit of 500.000000 IOPS for osd.7. IOPS capacity is unchanged at 315.000000 IOPS. The recommendation is to establish the osd's IOPS capacity using other benchmark tools (e.g. Fi added
Actions
Copy link
 #18

Updated by Backport Bot 3 months ago

  • Copied to Backport #64169: quincy: quincy: "OSD bench result of 228617.361065 IOPS exceeded the threshold limit of 500.000000 IOPS for osd.7. IOPS capacity is unchanged at 315.000000 IOPS. The recommendation is to establish the osd's IOPS capacity using other benchmark tools (e.g. added
Actions
Copy link
 #19

Updated by Backport Bot 3 months ago

  • Tags set to backport_processed
Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF