Bug #4449: osd/OSD.cc: 4626: FAILED assert(service.splitting(*i)) - Ceph - Ceph

Actions

Copy link

Bug #4449

closed

osd/OSD.cc: 4626: FAILED assert(service.splitting(*i))

Added by Samuel Just about 11 years ago. Updated about 11 years ago.

Status:

Resolved

Priority:

Urgent

Assignee:

Samuel Just

Category:

OSD

Target version:

% Done:

Source:

Development

Tags:

Backport:

bobtail

Regression:

Severity:

3 - minor

Reviewed:

Affected Versions:

ceph-qa-suite:

Pull request ID:

Crash signature (v1):

Crash signature (v2):

Description

2013-03-14 17:24:36.812903 7f644b432700 -1 osd/OSD.cc: In function 'void OSD::split_pgs(PG*, const std::set<pg_t>&, std::set<boost::intrusive_ptr<PG> >, OSDMapRef, OSDMapRef, PG::RecoveryCtx)' thread 7f644b432700 time 2013-03-14 17:24:36.784365
osd/OSD.cc: 4626: FAILED assert(service.splitting(*i))

ceph version 0.58-596-gf1c7755 (f1c7755ed921201b5a02927086a42419c83c5466)
 1: (OSD::split_pgs(PG*, std::set&lt;pg_t, std::less&lt;pg_t&gt;, std::allocator&lt;pg_t&gt; > const&, std::set&lt;boost::intrusive_ptr&lt;PG&gt;, std::less&lt;boost::intrusive_ptr&lt;PG&gt; >, std::allocator&lt;boost::intrusive_ptr&lt;PG&gt; > >, std::tr1::shared_ptr&lt;OSDMap const&gt;, std::tr1::shared_ptr&lt;OSDMap const&gt;, PG::RecoveryCtx)+0x14be) [0x61067e]
 2: (OSD::advance_pg(unsigned int, PG*, ThreadPool::TPHandle&, PG::RecoveryCtx*, std::set&lt;boost::intrusive_ptr&lt;PG&gt;, std::less&lt;boost::intrusive_ptr&lt;PG&gt; >, std::allocator&lt;boost::intrusive_ptr&lt;PG&gt; > >)+0x384) [0x635494]
 3: (OSD::process_peering_events(std::list&lt;PG, std::allocator&lt;PG*&gt; > const&, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x244) [0x635964]
 4: (OSD::PeeringWQ::_process(std::list&lt;PG*, std::allocator&lt;PG*&gt; > const&, ThreadPool::TPHandle&)+0x10) [0x66d590]
 5: (ThreadPool::worker(ThreadPool::WorkThread*)+0x4e6) [0x826326]
 6: (ThreadPool::WorkThread::entry()+0x10) [0x828150]
 7: (()+0x7e9a) [0x7f645bdc5e9a]
 8: (clone()+0x6d) [0x7f6459f5b4bd]
 NOTE: a copy of the executable, or `objdump -rdS &lt;executable&gt;` is needed to interpret this.

Have patch, pending merge of wip_4196