Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Bug #21665

closed

ceph -v gives luminous (stable) - should it be luminous (LTS)?

Added by Vikhyat Umrao over 6 years ago. Updated over 6 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Target version:
-
% Done:

0%

Source:
Tags:
Backport:
Regression:
No
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Pull request ID:
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):

Description

ceph -v gives luminous (stable) - should it be luminous (LTS)?

luminous(12.y.z) is an LTS release and we call stable all odd releases like 13.y.z will be `stable`.

Not sure if it was intentional or did we change anything in release type.

# ceph -v
ceph version 12.2.1 (3e7492b9ada8bdc9a5cd0feafd42fbca27f9c38e) luminous (stable)

# ceph daemon osd.0 version
{"version":"12.2.1","release":"luminous","release_type":"stable"}
Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Vikhyat Umrao over 6 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by Vikhyat Umrao over 6 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by Vikhyat Umrao over 6 years ago

  • Subject changed from ceph -v gives luminous (stable) - will it be luminous (LTS)? to ceph -v gives luminous (stable) - should it be luminous (LTS)?
  • Description updated (diff)
Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by Nathan Cutler over 6 years ago

Does "ceph -v" return "LTS" in any of the other LTS releases, i.e. jewel, hammer?

Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by Nathan Cutler over 6 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Need More Info
Actions
Copy link
 #6

Updated by Nathan Cutler over 6 years ago

LTS means Long Term Stable. The odd-numbered releases are just "Stable". In other words, both are "stable" - the only difference is the length of the maintenance period.

If jewel and hammer "ceph -v" says "LTS" instead of "stable", we should change it in luminous. Otherwise I would just leave it as it is?

Actions
Copy link
 #7

Updated by Vikhyat Umrao over 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Need More Info to Closed

Nathan Cutler wrote:

LTS means Long Term Stable. The odd-numbered releases are just "Stable". In other words, both are "stable" - the only difference is the length of the maintenance period.

If jewel and hammer "ceph -v" says "LTS" instead of "stable", we should change it in luminous. Otherwise I would just leave it as it is?

Thanks for the response Nathan. In jewel or hammer, we just used to give version string with sha1. This is all new came in the luminous release.

For example from jewel release:

$ ceph -v
ceph version 10.2.9 (2ee413f77150c0f375ff6f10edd6c8f9c7d060d0)

I checked previous beta and "rc" releases of luminous. I think "release_type" field purpose is Alfa, Beta, "rc" and then stable. Because of that it should be good. I misunderstood this release_type from the term Odd(Stable) and even(LTS).

I am closing this one.

Thanks,
Vikhyat

Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF