Actions
Bug #10004
closedceph osd find does not correctly report crush locations
% Done:
0%
Source:
other
Tags:
Backport:
Regression:
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Pull request ID:
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):
Description
ubuntu@vpm061:~$ ceph osd find 0
{ "osd": 0,
"ip": "10.214.138.176:6800\/31684",
"crush_location": { "host": "vpm113ssd"}}ubuntu@vpm061:~$
I expected osd 0 to be found at hosts: vpm113 and vpm113ssd
as seen in the crushmap below.
ubuntu@vpm061:~$ ceph osd crush dump -f json-pretty
{ "devices": [
{ "id": 0,
"name": "osd.0"},
{ "id": 1,
"name": "osd.1"},
{ "id": 2,
"name": "osd.2"}],
"types": [
{ "type_id": 0,
"name": "osd"},
{ "type_id": 1,
"name": "host"},
{ "type_id": 2,
"name": "chassis"},
{ "type_id": 3,
"name": "rack"},
{ "type_id": 4,
"name": "row"},
{ "type_id": 5,
"name": "pdu"},
{ "type_id": 6,
"name": "pod"},
{ "type_id": 7,
"name": "room"},
{ "type_id": 8,
"name": "datacenter"},
{ "type_id": 9,
"name": "region"},
{ "type_id": 10,
"name": "root"}],
"buckets": [
{ "id": -1,
"name": "default",
"type_id": 10,
"type_name": "root",
"weight": 19659,
"alg": "straw",
"hash": "rjenkins1",
"items": [
{ "id": -2,
"weight": 6553,
"pos": 0},
{ "id": -3,
"weight": 6553,
"pos": 1},
{ "id": -4,
"weight": 6553,
"pos": 2}]},
{ "id": -2,
"name": "vpm061",
"type_id": 1,
"type_name": "host",
"weight": 6553,
"alg": "straw",
"hash": "rjenkins1",
"items": [
{ "id": 1,
"weight": 6553,
"pos": 0}]},
{ "id": -3,
"name": "vpm113",
"type_id": 1,
"type_name": "host",
"weight": 6553,
"alg": "straw",
"hash": "rjenkins1",
"items": [
{ "id": 0,
"weight": 6553,
"pos": 0}]},
{ "id": -4,
"name": "vpm145",
"type_id": 1,
"type_name": "host",
"weight": 6553,
"alg": "straw",
"hash": "rjenkins1",
"items": [
{ "id": 2,
"weight": 6553,
"pos": 0}]},
{ "id": -5,
"name": "rackthing",
"type_id": 3,
"type_name": "rack",
"weight": 19659,
"alg": "straw",
"hash": "rjenkins1",
"items": [
{ "id": -2,
"weight": 6553,
"pos": 0},
{ "id": -3,
"weight": 6553,
"pos": 1},
{ "id": -4,
"weight": 6553,
"pos": 2}]},
{ "id": -10,
"name": "defaultssd",
"type_id": 10,
"type_name": "root",
"weight": 19659,
"alg": "straw",
"hash": "rjenkins1",
"items": [
{ "id": -5,
"weight": 19659,
"pos": 0}]},
{ "id": -20,
"name": "vpm061ssd",
"type_id": 1,
"type_name": "host",
"weight": 6553,
"alg": "straw",
"hash": "rjenkins1",
"items": [
{ "id": 1,
"weight": 6553,
"pos": 0}]},
{ "id": -30,
"name": "vpm113ssd",
"type_id": 1,
"type_name": "host",
"weight": 6553,
"alg": "straw",
"hash": "rjenkins1",
"items": [
{ "id": 0,
"weight": 6553,
"pos": 0}]},
{ "id": -40,
"name": "vpm145ssd",
"type_id": 1,
"type_name": "host",
"weight": 6553,
"alg": "straw",
"hash": "rjenkins1",
"items": [
{ "id": 2,
"weight": 6553,
"pos": 0}]}],
"rules": [
{ "rule_id": 0,
"rule_name": "replicated_ruleset",
"ruleset": 0,
"type": 1,
"min_size": 1,
"max_size": 10,
"steps": [
{ "op": "take",
"item": -1,
"item_name": "default"},
{ "op": "chooseleaf_firstn",
"num": 0,
"type": "host"},
{ "op": "emit"}]}],
"tunables": { "choose_local_tries": 0,
"choose_local_fallback_tries": 0,
"choose_total_tries": 50,
"chooseleaf_descend_once": 1,
"profile": "bobtail",
"optimal_tunables": 0,
"legacy_tunables": 0,
"require_feature_tunables": 1,
"require_feature_tunables2": 1}}
Updated by Dan Mick over 9 years ago
Moreover, it's no longer reporting the entire crush branch, but only the immediate parent; that's a change in behavior; although I don't know if it's intentional, it seems less helpful than it might.
regression from dumpling to firefly?
Updated by Sage Weil over 9 years ago
What version is this? I can't reproduce it on giant.
Updated by Dan Mick about 9 years ago
I see that current master reports the full location for a test cluster, as does firefly, but I don't have a dual-branch crushmap to test with.
Updated by Sage Weil about 9 years ago
- Status changed from New to Can't reproduce
Actions