Bug #52979
closed
librgw_op_tp.so and librgw_rados_tp.so are included in librgw2 package, but have a different major version number than librgw
Added by Nathan Cutler over 2 years ago.
Updated about 1 year ago.
Backport:
pacific, octopus
Description
librgw_op_tp.so and librgw_rados_tp.so are included in librgw2 package, but have a different major version number than librgw.
This causes RPMLINT to complain:
ceph.log:[18094s] librgw2.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-name-error SONAME: librgw_op_tp.so.1, expected package suffix: 1
ceph.log:[18094s] librgw2.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-name-error SONAME: librgw_rados_tp.so.1, expected package suffix: 1
( This bug was first reported at https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1191751 )
It's possible that this RPMLINT error is specific to openSUSE. If upstream doesn't think it's useful for the SO version numbers to be unified within the librgw2 RPM, we can carry the fix downstream.
- Status changed from New to Fix Under Review
- Pull request ID set to 43600
- Status changed from Fix Under Review to Pending Backport
- Copied to Backport #53005: pacific: librgw_op_tp.so and librgw_rados_tp.so are included in librgw2 package, but have a different major version number than librgw added
- Backport changed from pacific to pacific, octopus
- Copied to Backport #53009: octopus: librgw_op_tp.so and librgw_rados_tp.so are included in librgw2 package, but have a different major version number than librgw added
- Tags set to backport_processed
- Status changed from Pending Backport to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Also available in: Atom
PDF