Actions
Bug #52979
closedlibrgw_op_tp.so and librgw_rados_tp.so are included in librgw2 package, but have a different major version number than librgw
% Done:
100%
Source:
Tags:
backport_processed
Backport:
pacific, octopus
Regression:
No
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Description
librgw_op_tp.so and librgw_rados_tp.so are included in librgw2 package, but have a different major version number than librgw.
This causes RPMLINT to complain:
ceph.log:[18094s] librgw2.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-name-error SONAME: librgw_op_tp.so.1, expected package suffix: 1 ceph.log:[18094s] librgw2.x86_64: E: shlib-policy-name-error SONAME: librgw_rados_tp.so.1, expected package suffix: 1
( This bug was first reported at https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1191751 )
Updated by Nathan Cutler over 2 years ago
It's possible that this RPMLINT error is specific to openSUSE. If upstream doesn't think it's useful for the SO version numbers to be unified within the librgw2 RPM, we can carry the fix downstream.
Updated by Nathan Cutler over 2 years ago
- Status changed from New to Fix Under Review
- Pull request ID set to 43600
Updated by Casey Bodley over 2 years ago
- Status changed from Fix Under Review to Pending Backport
Updated by Backport Bot over 2 years ago
- Copied to Backport #53005: pacific: librgw_op_tp.so and librgw_rados_tp.so are included in librgw2 package, but have a different major version number than librgw added
Updated by Nathan Cutler over 2 years ago
- Backport changed from pacific to pacific, octopus
Updated by Backport Bot over 2 years ago
- Copied to Backport #53009: octopus: librgw_op_tp.so and librgw_rados_tp.so are included in librgw2 package, but have a different major version number than librgw added
Updated by Konstantin Shalygin about 1 year ago
- Status changed from Pending Backport to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Actions