Project

General

Profile

Actions

Feature #2426

closed

precise packages for apache2, fastcgi

Added by Sage Weil almost 12 years ago. Updated almost 12 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
-
Target version:
% Done:

0%

Source:
Tags:
Backport:
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
Pull request ID:
Actions #1

Updated by Sage Weil almost 12 years ago

Either set up a gitbuilder, or build the packages manually and put in a repo, or just use the dho packages+repo (built manually).

Actions #2

Updated by Sage Weil almost 12 years ago

Ok, I just rsynced the dho packages (manually built) over to the gitbuilder url. At the very least, need to document where the package sources are so they can be adjusted later.

Actions #3

Updated by Sage Weil almost 12 years ago

  • Translation missing: en.field_position deleted (1)
  • Translation missing: en.field_position set to 18
Actions #4

Updated by Sage Weil almost 12 years ago

  • Translation missing: en.field_story_points set to 2
  • Translation missing: en.field_position deleted (17)
  • Translation missing: en.field_position set to 17
Actions #5

Updated by Sage Weil almost 12 years ago

  • Target version set to v0.48
  • Translation missing: en.field_position deleted (10)
  • Translation missing: en.field_position set to 1246
Actions #6

Updated by Dan Mick almost 12 years ago

  • Assignee set to Dan Mick
Actions #7

Updated by Sage Weil almost 12 years ago

Pretty sure i built this on pudgy, whose disk has just died.

I'd apt-get source these and verify we can rebuild these packages, and then call this done. Sometime soon we will need to build a fastcgi package without the patch in there that dumps the full environment for every request... let's make sure we can do that easily.

Actions #8

Updated by Dan Mick almost 12 years ago

So I've built the packages from the git repo versions (not source, but binary) and they install on my
precise desktop without security complaint. I haven't yet located anything that can actually validate the signature and print a response; dpkg-sig is just silent about the package or the .changes file.
Maybe I could uninstall the Ceph key and try installing?...really unclear that the signature
is effective. I do see the PGP marks in .changes. ???

Actions #9

Updated by Sage Weil almost 12 years ago

Iiuc its apt and not dpkg that checks sigs. Creating and signing a repo and pointing apt at it is enough to generate the warnings. It sounds like its all set tho... let's double check tomorrow and then close this out!

Actions #10

Updated by Dan Mick almost 12 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Resolved

OK, I think the packages are workable now.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF