Activity
From 07/11/2016 to 08/09/2016
08/09/2016
- 02:34 PM Backport #16960 (Rejected): rpm: do not build static libraries
- The debian packaging includes the user-facing static libraries ('*.a') and libtool metadata ('*.la') files. In the rp...
- 09:19 AM Bug #16346 (Resolved): rpm: librgw-devel package does not depend on librgw2
- 09:19 AM Bug #16345 (Resolved): rpm: shared library devel packages do not follow the soname
08/08/2016
- 07:44 PM Bug #16345: rpm: shared library devel packages do not follow the soname
- Backporting this might cause lots of grief to downstream projects that are using the old package names.
- 07:41 PM Bug #16353: rpm: drop obsolete -compat metapackages
- Jewel is already released: we cannot drop stuff.
- 07:30 PM Backport #16960 (Fix Under Review): rpm: do not build static libraries
- *jewel PR*: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10616
- 07:20 PM Backport #16960 (Rejected): rpm: do not build static libraries
- The ceph.spec builds static libraries (because --disable-static is not passed to configure) and then removes them at ...
- 07:01 PM Backport #16959 (In Progress): jewel: rpm: OBS needs ExclusiveArch
- 07:00 PM Backport #16959 (Resolved): jewel: rpm: OBS needs ExclusiveArch
- https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10614
- 06:59 PM Bug #16936 (Pending Backport): rpm: OBS needs ExclusiveArch
- 05:56 PM Bug #16916: Hammer ceph-release Package Uses Obsolete URL
- Confirmed that the issue is resolved. Thanks Alfredo!...
- 03:43 PM Bug #16916 (Resolved): Hammer ceph-release Package Uses Obsolete URL
- ...
- 04:52 PM Bug #16346: rpm: librgw-devel package does not depend on librgw2
- Backport will be done in #16345
- 08:33 AM Bug #15046 (Resolved): RPM packaging puts ceph_daemon.py in ceph-common, Debian packaging puts it...
- 08:33 AM Bug #14906 (Resolved): redhat-lsb-core dependency was dropped, but is still needed
- 08:33 AM Bug #14773 (Resolved): Fix message on attempt to use tell in interactive mode
- 08:28 AM Backport #15048 (Rejected): infernalis: RPM packaging puts ceph_daemon.py in ceph-common, Debian ...
- 08:24 AM Backport #14945 (Rejected): infernalis: redhat-lsb-core dependency was dropped, but is still needed
- 08:24 AM Backport #14774 (Rejected): infernalis: Fix message on attempt to use tell in interactive mode
08/07/2016
- 09:16 PM Bug #16949 (Fix Under Review): rpm: ceph installs stuff in %_udevrulesdir but does not own that d...
- *master PR*: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10608
- 09:07 PM Bug #16949 (Resolved): rpm: ceph installs stuff in %_udevrulesdir but does not own that directory
- The ceph.spec.in file makes sure %_udevrulesdir is defined, and then it installs stuff in it, but it's missing a %dir...
- 09:26 AM Bug #14755 (Rejected): OBS needs ceph-rpmlintrc file
- Like the Epoch-elimination patch, this is an OBS-specific thing that doesn't need to be upstream.
- 09:24 AM Bug #14944 (Rejected): libtool: install: warning: `librados.la' has not been installed in `/usr/l...
- Warnings are probably harmless.
- 07:45 AM Fix #16947 (Rejected): rpm: unify openssl-devel build dependency
- 07:44 AM Fix #16947 (Closed): rpm: unify openssl-devel build dependency
- This isn't needed. The openssl package in SLE-12-SP1 and openSUSE has:...
- 06:51 AM Fix #16947 (Rejected): rpm: unify openssl-devel build dependency
- Currently the openssl-devel build dependency is expressed differently in the spec file for RH/CentOS and for SUSE. Ho...
- 07:41 AM Bug #15138 (Resolved): RPM: openldap-devel and openssl-devel do not exist in SLE/openSUSE
08/05/2016
- 03:15 PM Fix #16937 (Fix Under Review): disable LTTng-UST in openSUSE builds
- *master PR*: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10592
- 01:14 PM Fix #16937 (Resolved): disable LTTng-UST in openSUSE builds
- LTTng-UST is not present in openSUSE, so it needs to be disabled there.
- 03:08 PM Bug #16936 (Fix Under Review): rpm: OBS needs ExclusiveArch
- https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10594
- 12:18 PM Bug #16936 (Resolved): rpm: OBS needs ExclusiveArch
- For OBS builds we need to limit which architectures the RPMs are built for to only those architectures that are suppo...
- 01:22 PM Bug #16916: Hammer ceph-release Package Uses Obsolete URL
- New ceph-release is built, it just needs to get included in the new repo, signed, and published
- 01:22 PM Bug #16916: Hammer ceph-release Package Uses Obsolete URL
- Required a change in the Binary/Repo API to include newer ceph-release packages: https://github.com/ceph/chacra/pull/168
- 11:51 AM Bug #16916 (In Progress): Hammer ceph-release Package Uses Obsolete URL
08/03/2016
- 09:48 PM Bug #16916 (Resolved): Hammer ceph-release Package Uses Obsolete URL
- When installing the repo using this rpm: http://download.ceph.com/rpm-hammer/el7/noarch/ceph-release-1-0.el7.noarch.r...
07/28/2016
- 08:40 PM Fix #16440: [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- More issue description.
My initial problem was connected with hammer radosgw on el7. I couldn't run radosgw under... - 07:48 PM Fix #16440 (Pending Backport): [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
07/26/2016
- 08:56 AM Cleanup #15549: systemd unit files are getting installed twice
- *master PR*: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/8667
(checked jewel and it's fixed there as well)
07/22/2016
- 08:42 PM Backport #16795 (In Progress): jewel: libatomic-ops-devel was renamed in May 2012 - fix in ceph.spec
- 08:36 PM Backport #16795 (Resolved): jewel: libatomic-ops-devel was renamed in May 2012 - fix in ceph.spec
- https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10357
- 08:35 PM Fix #16645 (Pending Backport): libatomic-ops-devel was renamed in May 2012 - fix in ceph.spec
- 12:45 PM Feature #16776 (In Progress): Enable RPM build without ceph-test subpackage
- 11:47 AM Feature #16776 (Resolved): Enable RPM build without ceph-test subpackage
- A full build of ceph, including the ceph-test package, requires much more computational resources than building witho...
07/21/2016
- 06:25 PM Bug #15874: Upon hammer->jewel upgrade, OSD cannot access journal device until after reboot
- Workaround:...
07/20/2016
- 09:27 AM Backport #16750 (In Progress): jewel: ceph-osd-prestart.sh contains Upstart-specific code
- 09:05 AM Backport #16750 (Resolved): jewel: ceph-osd-prestart.sh contains Upstart-specific code
- https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10364
- 09:04 AM Bug #15984 (Pending Backport): ceph-osd-prestart.sh contains Upstart-specific code
- 08:29 AM Fix #16645 (Fix Under Review): libatomic-ops-devel was renamed in May 2012 - fix in ceph.spec
- *master PR*: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10363
- 05:28 AM Backport #16748 (In Progress): jewel: mount.ceph: move from ceph-base to ceph-common and add syml...
- 05:17 AM Backport #16748 (Resolved): jewel: mount.ceph: move from ceph-base to ceph-common and add symlink...
- https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10357
- 05:16 AM Fix #16598 (Pending Backport): mount.ceph: move from ceph-base to ceph-common and add symlink in ...
07/19/2016
- 05:00 PM Fix #16598: mount.ceph: move from ceph-base to ceph-common and add symlink in /sbin for SUSE
- Sigh, the symbolic link creation code was all wrong. Fix is here: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10353
- 09:22 AM Fix #16598: mount.ceph: move from ceph-base to ceph-common and add symlink in /sbin for SUSE
- Backporting note: any jewel backport would need https://github.com/ceph/ceph/52021ff9
- 12:39 AM Fix #16598 (Resolved): mount.ceph: move from ceph-base to ceph-common and add symlink in /sbin fo...
07/18/2016
- 02:37 PM Fix #16598: mount.ceph: move from ceph-base to ceph-common and add symlink in /sbin for SUSE
- *master PR*: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10147
- 02:36 PM Fix #16598: mount.ceph: move from ceph-base to ceph-common and add symlink in /sbin for SUSE
07/14/2016
- 10:50 AM Backport #16442 (In Progress): hammer: [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
07/11/2016
- 11:38 AM Fix #16440: [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- @Vladislav: Kraken backporting has not started yet. The "master" and "kraken" branches are currently in lock-step. Se...
- 10:45 AM Fix #16440: [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- Backport to kraken: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16652
- 09:39 AM Fix #16440: [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- Need backports:
hammer
jewel
kraken - 05:44 AM Fix #16440 (Resolved): [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
Also available in: Atom