Project

General

Profile

Actions

HOWTO describe a test result » History » Revision 1

Revision 1/8 | Next »
Loïc Dachary, 03/26/2015 09:33 AM


Format of teuthology analysis entries

For instance http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11153#rgw is structured like so:

  • In chronological order
  • The command line (that can be copy/pasted) used to run the suite
  • A bullet point with the URL to the suite run in pulpito prefixed by
    • running if the run is not complete
    • red if the run has at least one error
    • green if the run has no error
  • If the run has at least one error, the output of the fail formatter snippet (found at http://workbench.dachary.org/dachary/ceph-workbench/issues/2 is appened to it) is added and edited when the errors are analyzed
  • When an error is analyzed, the link to the error is prefixed with
    • environmental noise if it must be run again because it failed for reasons unrelated to the test itself (DNS error etc.)
    • known bug and a URL to the bug (not just the number of the bug)
    • new bug and a URL to the newly created bug if it was discovered during the analysis of this error: it is likely to be a regression

Updated by Loïc Dachary about 9 years ago · 1 revisions