Project

General

Profile

HOWTO » History » Version 7

Yuri Weinstein, 03/23/2015 04:26 PM

1 2 Loïc Dachary
h3. HOWTO backport
2 1 Loïc Dachary
3
Based on what would be done for the Giant branch
4
5
h3. Update the inventory
6
7
* ssh -p2222 backports@workbench.dachary.org
8
* screen -x
9
* ( cd .. ; github2gitlab --github-token $github_token --github-repo ceph/ceph --gitlab-url http://workbench.dachary.org --gitlab-token $gitlab_token --gitlab-repo ceph/ceph-backports --branches master,dumpling,emperor,firefly,giant,hammer,firefly-backports,giant-backports,dumpling-backports --verbose )
10
* ( python ../sanity.py ; cd ../ceph-backports.wiki ; git commit -a -m 'update' ; git push )
11
* firefox http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph-backports/wikis/giant
12
13 7 Yuri Weinstein
h3. Major release (e.g. hammer) QA suites results, open issues summarization process
14
15
* all planned features were committed to the branch
16
* ceph QA suites are being executed by "nightlies" (crontab teuthology@theuthology in Sepia lab)
17
* a new section is added to the http://tracker.ceph.com/rb/master_backlog/ceph-releases# , as for example for "hammer v0.94.1" with version number
18
* all suites listed as tasks and results summaries + related tickets are listed there
19
* as suite passed, and all issues resolved, the task is marked a resolved and thus indicates readiness for the final release cut   
20
21 1 Loïc Dachary
h3. Backport issues
22
23
The helper snippet at http://workbench.dachary.org/dachary/ceph-workbench/issues/3 can be used to semi automate the process below
24
25
* For each entry at http://workbench.dachary.org/ceph/ceph-backports/wikis/giant#issues-that-need-backporting
26
* git cherry-pick -x the commits from the pull request that was targettig master (not from the pull requests targeting stable branches)
27
* create a pull request with the backport with a reference to the issue and set the milestone to giant
28
* add a reference to the pull request in the issue
29
* if the make check bot finds a problem, fix it
30
31 2 Loïc Dachary
h3. Collect pending pull requests into an integration branch
32 1 Loïc Dachary
33
The snippet at http://workbench.dachary.org/dachary/ceph-workbench/issues/4 can help
34
35
* create a giant-backport branch
36
* fetch all pull requests from github
37
* git merge all pull requests
38
* modify the pull requests individually to fix merge conflicts (i.e. they must merge cleanly, which may involving aggregating two pull requests into a single one designed to properly resolve the conflict)
39
* compile with ./autogen.sh ; ./configure ; make -j4
40
* modify the pull requests individually to fix compilation errors
41 3 Loïc Dachary
42
h3. Format of teuthology analysis entries
43
44
For instance http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11153#rgw is structured like so:
45
46
* In chronological order
47
* The command line (that can be copy/pasted) used to run the suite
48
* A bullet point with the URL to the suite run in pulpito prefixed by
49
** *running* if the run is not complete
50
** *red* if the run has at least one error
51
** *green* if the run has no error
52 4 Loïc Dachary
* If the run has at least one error, the output of the fail formatter snippet (found at http://workbench.dachary.org/dachary/ceph-workbench/issues/2 is appened to it) is added and edited when the errors are analyzed
53 6 Loïc Dachary
* When an error is analyzed, the link to the error is prefixed with
54
** *environmental noise* if it must be run again because it failed for reasons unrelated to the test itself (DNS error etc.)
55
** *known bug* and a URL to the bug (not just the number of the bug)
56
** *new bug* and a URL to the newly created bug if it was discovered during the analysis of this error: it is likely to be a regression
57 5 Loïc Dachary
58
h3. Synchronized repositories
59
60
When running teuthology tests for a given branch (say giant), the "ceph-qa-suite":https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite branch must match. In the simplest case it is enough to write:
61
<pre>
62
teuthology-suite --suite-branch giant ... --ceph giant ...
63
</pre>
64
When a Ceph pull request (for instance "rgw acl response should start with <?xml version=1.0 ?>":https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4082) needs to be synchronized with a ceph-qa-suite pull request (for instance "create a new get_acl helper to ensure proper xml is compared":https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/pull/370), dedicated branches must be created in the Ceph and ceph-qa-suite repositories. For instance:
65
<pre>
66
teuthology-suite --suite-branch wip-rgw-acl-giant ... --ceph giant-backports ...
67
</pre>
68
Note that it is not possible to specify a branch that is outside of the Ceph or ceph-qa-suite repositories: write access to these repositories is necessary.
69
70
For S3 tests an additional repository must be synchronized in a similar way https://github.com/ceph/s3-tests: there must exist a branch with the same name as the branch specified with **--suite-branch**. For instance the "ceph-qa-suite wip-rgw-acl-giant":https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/tree/wip-rgw-acl-giant branch must have a "s3-test wip-rgw-acl-giant":https://github.com/ceph/s3-tests/tree/wip-rgw-acl-giant counterpart.