Bug #9479
ETag is not included in the XML response to put object copy operation
0%
Description
User performs a put object copy operation, and the ETag is not included in the XML response.
Associated revisions
rgw: send back ETag on S3 object copy
Fixes: #9479
Backport: firefly, giant
We didn't send the etag back correctly. Original code assumed the etag
resided in the attrs, but attrs only contained request attrs.
Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
rgw: send back ETag on S3 object copy
Fixes: #9479
Backport: firefly, giant
We didn't send the etag back correctly. Original code assumed the etag
resided in the attrs, but attrs only contained request attrs.
Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit b1bfc3a7e0c9088f01f8ff770ae14f569fbc570d)
Conflicts:
src/rgw/rgw_rados.cc
rgw: send back ETag on S3 object copy
Fixes: #9479
Backport: firefly, giant
We didn't send the etag back correctly. Original code assumed the etag
resided in the attrs, but attrs only contained request attrs.
Signed-off-by: Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit b1bfc3a7e0c9088f01f8ff770ae14f569fbc570d)
History
#1 Updated by JuanJose Galvez over 7 years ago
- Project changed from ICE to rgw
- Source changed from other to Support
This is under v0.67.10
#2 Updated by Sage Weil over 7 years ago
- Priority changed from Normal to High
#3 Updated by Yehuda Sadeh over 7 years ago
- Status changed from New to Fix Under Review
- Assignee set to Josh Durgin
#4 Updated by Yehuda Sadeh over 7 years ago
- Backport set to firefly, giant
#5 Updated by Josh Durgin over 7 years ago
- Status changed from Fix Under Review to Pending Backport
- Assignee changed from Josh Durgin to Yehuda Sadeh
commit:b1bfc3a7e0c9088f01f8ff770ae14f569fbc570d
#6 Updated by Loïc Dachary over 7 years ago
- Status changed from Pending Backport to Resolved