Project

General

Profile

Actions

Backport #63782

open

reef: qa: add support/qa for cephfs-shell on CentOS 9 / RHEL9

Added by Backport Bot 5 months ago. Updated 25 days ago.

Status:
In Progress
Priority:
High
Target version:
Release:
reef
Pull request ID:
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Copied from CephFS - Bug #43393: qa: add support/qa for cephfs-shell on CentOS 9 / RHEL9ResolvedPatrick Donnelly

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Backport Bot 5 months ago

  • Copied from Bug #43393: qa: add support/qa for cephfs-shell on CentOS 9 / RHEL9 added
Actions #2

Updated by Patrick Donnelly 5 months ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Status changed from New to In Progress
Actions #3

Updated by Venky Shankar 5 months ago

Backport Bot wrote:

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/54865

Merged.

Actions #4

Updated by Patrick Donnelly 5 months ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
  • Target version set to v18.2.2
Actions #5

Updated by Venky Shankar 3 months ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to In Progress

Also need to include changes from https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/55233.

Temp revert PR is: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/55290

Actions #6

Updated by Patrick Donnelly 2 months ago

Venky Shankar wrote:

Also need to include changes from https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/55233.

Temp revert PR is: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/55290

Venky, can you explain what the problem is? I don't see why #55233 is necessary.

Actions #7

Updated by Ilya Dryomov about 1 month ago

  • Target version changed from v18.2.2 to v18.2.3
Actions #8

Updated by Venky Shankar 25 days ago

Patrick Donnelly wrote:

Venky Shankar wrote:

Also need to include changes from https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/55233.

Temp revert PR is: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/55290

Venky, can you explain what the problem is? I don't see why #55233 is necessary.

#55233 isn't necessary for the revert PR - just that I had included both in my test branch. I probably hurried to put an update since the original change (to add cephfs-shell support for centos9/rhel9) was breaking fs suite.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF