Project

General

Profile

Bug #57529

mclock backfill is getting higher priority than WPQ

Added by Vikhyat Umrao 11 months ago. Updated 8 months ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
High
Assignee:
Sridhar Seshasayee
Category:
-
Target version:
-
% Done:

0%

Source:
Tags:
backport_processed
Backport:
quincy
Regression:
No
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
Ceph - v17.2.1
ceph-qa-suite:
Component(RADOS):
Pull request ID:
48226
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):

Description

Downstream BZ - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126559
Version - 17.2.1

Related issues

Duplicated by RADOS - Bug #57532: Notice discrepancies in the performance of mclock built-in profiles Duplicate
Copied to RADOS - Backport #58273: quincy: mclock backfill is getting higher priority than WPQ Resolved

History

#1 Updated by Vikhyat Umrao 11 months ago

  • Assignee set to Sridhar Seshasayee
  • Priority changed from Normal to High

#2 Updated by Radoslaw Zarzynski 11 months ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress

Marking as WIP as IIRC Sridhar was talking about this issue during core standups.

#3 Updated by Radoslaw Zarzynski 11 months ago

  • Duplicated by Bug #57532: Notice discrepancies in the performance of mclock built-in profiles added

#4 Updated by Radoslaw Zarzynski 10 months ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Fix Under Review
  • Pull request ID set to 48226

#5 Updated by Neha Ojha 8 months ago

  • Status changed from Fix Under Review to Pending Backport
  • Backport set to quincy

#6 Updated by Backport Bot 8 months ago

  • Copied to Backport #58273: quincy: mclock backfill is getting higher priority than WPQ added

#7 Updated by Backport Bot 8 months ago

  • Tags set to backport_processed

#8 Updated by Sridhar Seshasayee 8 months ago

  • Status changed from Pending Backport to Resolved

Also available in: Atom PDF