Project

General

Profile

Feature #5520

osdc: should handle namespaces

Added by David Zafman almost 7 years ago. Updated 7 months ago.

Status:
Rejected
Priority:
High
Assignee:
Category:
-
Target version:
% Done:

0%

Source:
Development
Tags:
Backport:
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
Component(FS):
osdc
Labels (FS):
multifs, task(intern), task(medium)
Pull request ID:

Description

As a follow on to 4982/4983 we should implement namespace handling in the ObjectCacher.


Related issues

Blocks fs - Feature #22477: multifs: remove multifs experimental warnings New 12/19/2017
Blocks fs - Feature #15066: multifs: Allow filesystems to be assigned RADOS namespace as well as pool for metadata and data Rejected

History

#1 Updated by Ian Colle almost 7 years ago

  • Tracker changed from Bug to Feature

This is needed before librbd or cephfs can use namespaces

#2 Updated by Ian Colle almost 7 years ago

  • Subject changed from ObjectCacher doesn't handle namespaces to ObjectCacher should handle namespaces

#3 Updated by Patrick Donnelly almost 2 years ago

  • Project changed from Ceph to fs
  • Subject changed from ObjectCacher should handle namespaces to osdc: should handle namespaces
  • Priority changed from Normal to High
  • Target version set to v14.0.0
  • Component(FS) osdc added
  • Labels (FS) multifs, task(medium) added

#4 Updated by Patrick Donnelly almost 2 years ago

  • Blocks Feature #22477: multifs: remove multifs experimental warnings added

#5 Updated by Patrick Donnelly over 1 year ago

  • Assignee set to Jos Collin
  • Target version changed from v14.0.0 to v15.0.0
  • Start date deleted (07/08/2013)
  • Source changed from other to Development
  • Labels (FS) task(intern) added

#6 Updated by Jos Collin about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress

#7 Updated by Jos Collin about 1 year ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to New

#8 Updated by Patrick Donnelly about 1 year ago

  • Blocks Feature #15066: multifs: Allow filesystems to be assigned RADOS namespace as well as pool for metadata and data added

#9 Updated by Jos Collin 11 months ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress

#10 Updated by Jos Collin 8 months ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to New

#11 Updated by Patrick Donnelly 7 months ago

  • Status changed from New to Rejected

Now that pg_autoscaler exists with pg merging, this feature is not compelling. Using separate pools for multifs has always been more attractive from an accounting perspective. Now pools are cheap to make and use so let's just do that.

Also available in: Atom PDF