Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #54524

open

the bucket resharding logs should be INFO and not ERROR?

Added by Vikhyat Umrao about 2 years ago. Updated about 2 years ago.

Status:
Need More Info
Priority:
Normal
Target version:
-
% Done:

0%

Source:
Tags:
Backport:
Regression:
No
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Pull request ID:
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):

Description

2022-03-10T13:51:49.348+0000 7fe660162700  0 req 6745898533330192612 315.525390625s swift:put_obj block_while_resharding ERROR: bucket is still resharding, please retry

2022-03-10T12:00:02.906+0000 7fe711ac5700  0 rgw index completion thread: ERROR: process(): bucket index completion failed, obj=mycontainers1:myobjects48266839 r=-2300

2022-03-10T12:02:40.818+0000 7fe7122c6700  0 process_entry: Error during resharding bucket mycontainers1:(16) Device or resource busy

- We know these messages are just for information purposes that the bucket is busy with resharding showing them in ERROR creates confusion, we think they should be INFO?

Actions #1

Updated by Casey Bodley about 2 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Triaged
  • Assignee set to J. Eric Ivancich
Actions #2

Updated by J. Eric Ivancich about 2 years ago

  • Status changed from Triaged to Need More Info

A failure to reshard seems like it deserves at least a WARNING (1st and 3rd examples).

Your 2nd example looks like a failure to complete a bucket index transaction. That seems like an error to me.

What do others think?

Actions #3

Updated by Vikhyat Umrao about 2 years ago

J. Eric Ivancich wrote:

Thanks, Eric.

A failure to reshard seems like it deserves at least a WARNING (1st and 3rd examples).

But I think again this is not a real failure it is just that some other RGW process is trying to reshard when the bucket is already been resharded from a different RGW? So maybe in warning with better explanation in the log message - may be changing a little bit log message?

Your 2nd example looks like a failure to complete a bucket index transaction. That seems like an error to me.

Please check the RHBZ comment - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2062855#c7 looks like this is again a non-fatal error.

What do others think?

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF