Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #50247

closed

pacific build fails

Added by Yuri Weinstein about 3 years ago. Updated almost 3 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Urgent
Assignee:
Category:
-
Target version:
-
% Done:

0%

Source:
Q/A
Tags:
Backport:
Regression:
No
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Pull request ID:
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):

Description

https://jenkins.ceph.com/job/ceph-pull-requests/73037/consoleFull#-2125701813e4bfde06-44c1-4b3c-8379-d9ee175fb257

/home/jenkins-build/build/workspace/ceph-pull-requests/src/common/async/completion.h:194:29: error: 'boost::asio::executor_work_guard<boost::asio::execution::any_executor<boost::asio::execution::context_as_t<boost::asio::execution_context&>, boost::asio::execution::detail::blocking::never_t<0>, boost::asio::execution::prefer_only<boost::asio::execution::detail::blocking::possibly_t<0> >, boost::asio::execution::prefer_only<boost::asio::execution::detail::outstanding_work::tracked_t<0> >, boost::asio::execution::prefer_only<boost::asio::execution::detail::outstanding_work::untracked_t<0> >, boost::asio::execution::prefer_only<boost::asio::execution::detail::relationship::fork_t<0> >, boost::asio::execution::prefer_only<boost::asio::execution::detail::relationship::continuation_t<0> > >, void>::executor_type' {aka 'class boost::asio::execution::any_executor<boost::asio::execution::context_as_t<boost::asio::execution_context&>, boost::asio::execution::detail::blocking::never_t<0>, boost::asio::execution::prefer_only<boost::asio::execution::detail::blocking::possibly_t<0> >, boost::asio::execution::prefer_only<boost::asio::execution::detail::outstanding_work::tracked_t<0> >, boost::asio::execution::prefer_only<boost::asio::execution::detail::outstanding_work::untracked_t<0> >, boost::asio::execution::prefer_only<boost::asio::execution::detail::relationship::fork_t<0> >, boost::asio::execution::prefer_only<boost::asio::execution::detail::relationship::continuation_t<0> > >'} has no member named 'defer'; did you mean 'prefer'?
194 | w.second.get_executor().defer(std::move(f), alloc2);

See also https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/40677#issuecomment-815955892


Related issues 2 (1 open1 closed)

Related to Ceph - Bug #50694: nautilus build failNew

Actions
Has duplicate Ceph - Bug #50244: pacific: FTBFS has no member named 'defer'; did you mean 'prefer'?Duplicate

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Yuri Weinstein about 3 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #2

Updated by Neha Ojha about 3 years ago

  • Priority changed from Normal to Urgent

make check fails with this issue on all pacific PRs since yesterday

Actions #3

Updated by Casey Bodley about 3 years ago

not sure what happened yesterday, but it looks like we want https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/40230 and/or https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/40293 on pacific

Actions #4

Updated by Casey Bodley about 3 years ago

  • Assignee set to Casey Bodley
Actions #5

Updated by Casey Bodley about 3 years ago

  • Pull request ID set to 40706
Actions #6

Updated by Casey Bodley about 3 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Fix Under Review
Actions #7

Updated by singuliere _ about 3 years ago

  • Has duplicate Bug #50244: pacific: FTBFS has no member named 'defer'; did you mean 'prefer'? added
Actions #8

Updated by Sage Weil almost 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Fix Under Review to Resolved
Actions #9

Updated by Yuri Weinstein almost 3 years ago

  • Related to Bug #50694: nautilus build fail added
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF