https://tracker.ceph.com/https://tracker.ceph.com/favicon.ico2021-03-03T13:09:24ZCeph rgw - Bug #49302: Huge amount of RGW crashes in the multisite setup with a backtrace https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/49302?journal_id=1864322021-03-03T13:09:24ZMule Te
<ul></ul><p>I have the same issue here. Another problem I notice is old objects will not be synced to secondary zone. :(</p> rgw - Bug #49302: Huge amount of RGW crashes in the multisite setup with a backtrace https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/49302?journal_id=1864332021-03-03T13:11:11ZIst Gab
<ul></ul><p>Mule Te wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>I have the same issue here. Another problem I notice is old objects will not be synced to secondary zone. :(</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, I have that one too.</p> rgw - Bug #49302: Huge amount of RGW crashes in the multisite setup with a backtrace https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/49302?journal_id=1939732021-05-05T14:18:14ZSage Weilsage@newdream.net
<ul><li><strong>Project</strong> changed from <i>Ceph</i> to <i>rgw</i></li></ul> rgw - Bug #49302: Huge amount of RGW crashes in the multisite setup with a backtrace https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/49302?journal_id=2150762022-04-22T18:09:25ZCasey Bodleycbodley@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Fix Under Review</i></li><li><strong>Pull request ID</strong> set to <i>46007</i></li></ul> rgw - Bug #49302: Huge amount of RGW crashes in the multisite setup with a backtrace https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/49302?journal_id=2152712022-04-26T16:26:01ZCasey Bodleycbodley@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Fix Under Review</i> to <i>Pending Backport</i></li><li><strong>Backport</strong> set to <i>octopus pacific quincy</i></li></ul> rgw - Bug #49302: Huge amount of RGW crashes in the multisite setup with a backtrace https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/49302?journal_id=2152732022-04-26T16:32:13ZBackport Bot
<ul><li><strong>Copied to</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-9 status-3 priority-4 priority-default closed" href="/issues/55457">Backport #55457</a>: pacific: Huge amount of RGW crashes in the multisite setup with a backtrace </i> added</li></ul> rgw - Bug #49302: Huge amount of RGW crashes in the multisite setup with a backtrace https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/49302?journal_id=2152752022-04-26T16:32:20ZBackport Bot
<ul><li><strong>Copied to</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-9 status-3 priority-4 priority-default closed" href="/issues/55458">Backport #55458</a>: quincy: Huge amount of RGW crashes in the multisite setup with a backtrace </i> added</li></ul> rgw - Bug #49302: Huge amount of RGW crashes in the multisite setup with a backtrace https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/49302?journal_id=2152772022-04-26T16:32:28ZBackport Bot
<ul><li><strong>Copied to</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-9 status-3 priority-4 priority-default closed" href="/issues/55459">Backport #55459</a>: octopus: Huge amount of RGW crashes in the multisite setup with a backtrace </i> added</li></ul> rgw - Bug #49302: Huge amount of RGW crashes in the multisite setup with a backtrace https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/49302?journal_id=2218502022-07-28T22:02:34ZCasey Bodleycbodley@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Duplicated by</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-1 status-14 priority-4 priority-default" href="/issues/56920">Bug #56920</a>: crash: RGWCoroutinesStack::wakeup()</i> added</li></ul> rgw - Bug #49302: Huge amount of RGW crashes in the multisite setup with a backtrace https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/49302?journal_id=2228222022-08-08T16:34:40ZBackport Bot
<ul><li><strong>Tags</strong> changed from <i>Multisite, sync, rgw</i> to <i>Multisite, sync, rgw backport_processed</i></li></ul> rgw - Bug #49302: Huge amount of RGW crashes in the multisite setup with a backtrace https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/49302?journal_id=2234722022-08-15T12:28:02ZKonstantin Shalygink0ste@k0ste.ru
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Pending Backport</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li><li><strong>Tags</strong> changed from <i>Multisite, sync, rgw backport_processed</i> to <i>Multisite, sync, rgw</i></li></ul>