Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #4836

closed

crush_ops failure

Added by Samuel Just almost 11 years ago. Updated almost 11 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
High
Assignee:
Category:
Monitor
Target version:
-
% Done:

0%

Source:
Q/A
Tags:
Backport:
bobtail
Regression:
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Pull request ID:
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):

Description

2013-04-26T02:37:53.631 INFO:teuthology.task.mon_thrash.ceph_manager:quorum is size 2
2013-04-26T02:37:53.632 DEBUG:teuthology.misc:with jobid basedir: 1258
2013-04-26T02:37:53.632 DEBUG:teuthology.orchestra.run:Running [10.214.132.23]: '/home/ubuntu/cephtest/1258/enable-coredump ceph-coverage /home/ubuntu/cephtest/1258/archive/coverage ceph --concise m 10.214.132.23:6789 mon_status'
2013-04-26T02:37:53.806 INFO:teuthology.task.workunit.client.0.err:+ o1=6
2013-04-26T02:37:53.806 INFO:teuthology.task.workunit.client.0.err:+ ceph osd create
2013-04-26T02:37:53.916 DEBUG:teuthology.misc:with jobid basedir: 1258
2013-04-26T02:37:53.916 DEBUG:teuthology.orchestra.run:Running [10.214.132.23]: '/home/ubuntu/cephtest/1258/enable-coredump ceph-coverage /home/ubuntu/cephtest/1258/archive/coverage ceph --concise -m 10.214.132.22:6789 mon_status'
2013-04-26T02:37:53.947 INFO:teuthology.task.mon_thrash.mon_thrasher:waiting for 20.0 secs before reviving monitors
2013-04-26T02:37:54.960 INFO:teuthology.task.workunit.client.0.err:+ o2=7
2013-04-26T02:37:54.960 INFO:teuthology.task.workunit.client.0.err:+ ceph osd crush add 6 1 host=host1 root=foo
2013-04-26T02:37:54.981 INFO:teuthology.task.workunit.client.0.err:(22) Invalid argument
2013-04-26T02:37:54.983 INFO:teuthology.task.workunit:Stopping mon/crush_ops.sh on client.0...
2013-04-26T02:37:54.983 DEBUG:teuthology.orchestra.run:Running [10.214.132.22]: 'rm -rf -
/home/ubuntu/cephtest/1258/workunits.list /home/ubuntu/cephtest/1258/workunit.client.0'


Related issues 1 (0 open1 closed)

Related to Ceph - Fix #4635: mon: many ops expose uncommitted stateResolvedJoao Eduardo Luis04/02/2013

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Sage Weil almost 11 years ago

all of these commands need similar treatment, and i think we can structure it in a reasonably clean and generic way. i don't think this should block cuttlefish.

also, i think all of the changes conflict with dan's in-progress rewrite. it is probably best to fix them in the new implementation, and leave cuttlefish as is.

Actions #2

Updated by Sage Weil almost 11 years ago

  • Priority changed from Urgent to High
Actions #3

Updated by Samuel Just almost 11 years ago

  • Status changed from 12 to Resolved
Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF