Project

General

Profile

Bug #47565

qa: "client.4606 isn't responding to mclientcaps(revoke), ino 0x200000007d5 pending pAsLsXsFscr issued pAsLsXsFsxcrwb, sent 60.889494 seconds ago"

Added by Patrick Donnelly 4 months ago. Updated about 2 months ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Urgent
Assignee:
Category:
Testing
Target version:
% Done:

0%

Source:
Q/A
Tags:
Backport:
octopus,nautilus
Regression:
No
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Component(FS):
Client, MDS
Labels (FS):
qa, qa-failure
Pull request ID:
Crash signature:

Description

failure_reason: '"2020-09-20T16:27:35.946549+0000 mds.b (mds.0) 1 : cluster [WRN]
  client.4606 isn''t responding to mclientcaps(revoke), ino 0x200000007d5 pending
  pAsLsXsFscr issued pAsLsXsFsxcrwb, sent 60.889494 seconds ago" in cluster log'

From: /ceph/teuthology-archive/pdonnell-2020-09-20_07:13:47-multimds-wip-pdonnell-testing-20200920.040823-distro-basic-smithi/5451587/teuthology.log

and

Failure: "2020-09-20T16:27:35.946549+0000 mds.b (mds.0) 1 : cluster [WRN] client.4606 isn't responding to mclientcaps(revoke), ino 0x200000007d5 pending pAsLsXsFscr issued pAsLsXsFsxcrwb, sent 60.889494 seconds ago" in cluster log
7 jobs: ['5451587', '5451424', '5451680', '5451482', '5451488', '5451475', '5451715']
suites intersection: ['conf/{client', 'mds', 'mon', 'osd}', 'whitelist_health']
suites union: ['begin', 'centos_latest', 'clusters/3-mds', 'clusters/9-mds', 'conf/{client', 'fuse-default-perm-no}', 'inline/no', 'inline/yes', 'k-testing}', 'mds', 'mon', 'mon-debug', 'mount', 'mount/fuse', 'mount/kclient/{k-testing', 'mount/kclient/{mount', 'ms-die-on-skipped}', 'ms-die-on-skipped}}', 'multimds/basic/{0-supported-random-distro$/{centos_8}', 'multimds/basic/{0-supported-random-distro$/{rhel_8}', 'multimds/basic/{0-supported-random-distro$/{ubuntu_latest}', 'multimds/verify/{begin', 'objectstore-ec/bluestore-bitmap', 'objectstore-ec/bluestore-comp', 'objectstore-ec/bluestore-comp-ec-root', 'objectstore-ec/bluestore-ec-root', 'osd}', 'overrides/{basic/{frag_enable', 'overrides/{distro/testing/{flavor/ubuntu_latest', 'overrides/{fuse-default-perm-no', 'q_check_counter/check_counter', 'tasks/cfuse_workunit_suites_blogbench}', 'tasks/cfuse_workunit_suites_ffsb}', 'tasks/cfuse_workunit_suites_fsstress', 'validater/valgrind}', 'verify/{frag_enable', 'whitelist_health', 'whitelist_wrongly_marked_down}', 'whitelist_wrongly_marked_down}}']

This looks like some kind of multimds bug with a client having caps with 2+ MDS. Here's the relevant MDS log for 5451587:

./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:26:35.055+0000 7f47c6334700 10 mds.0.4 send_message_client_counted client.4606 seq 1751 client_caps(revoke ino 0x200000007d5 182 seq 11 caps=pAsLsXsFscr dirty=- wanted=Fxcb follows 0 mseq 1 size 104857600/213909504 ts 1/18446744073709551615 mtime 2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000) v11
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:26:35.055+0000 7f47c6334700  1 -- [v2:172.21.15.120:6835/1535229919,v1:172.21.15.120:6837/1535229919] --> 172.21.15.110:0/2458736152 -- client_caps(revoke ino 0x200000007d5 182 seq 11 caps=pAsLsXsFscr dirty=- wanted=Fxcb follows 0 mseq 1 size 104857600/213909504 ts 1/18446744073709551615 mtime 2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000) v11 -- 0x55a9729bd200 con 0x55a972739800
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:26:35.055+0000 7f47c6334700 10 mds.0.cache.ino(0x200000007d5) auth_pin by 0x55a972d41a10 on [inode 0x200000007d5 [2,head] /client.1/tmp/tmp/data/datafile116 auth{1=1} v2245 ap=2 dirtyparent s=104857600 n(v0 rc2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000 b104857600 1=1+0) (ifile excl->sync) (iversion lock) cr={4606=0-213909504@1} caps={4606=pAsLsXsFscr/pAsLsXsFsxcrwb/Fxcb@11},l=4606 | ptrwaiter=0 request=0 lock=0 importingcaps=0 caps=1 dirtyparent=1 replicated=1 dirty=1 waiter=0 authpin=1 0x55a972d41700] now 2
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:26:35.944+0000 7f47c4b31700 20 mds.0.locker caps_tick age = 0.888669 client.4606.0x200000007d5
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:26:40.944+0000 7f47c4b31700 20 mds.0.locker caps_tick age = 5.888904 client.4606.0x200000007d5
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:26:45.944+0000 7f47c4b31700 20 mds.0.locker caps_tick age = 10.889030 client.4606.0x200000007d5
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:26:50.944+0000 7f47c4b31700 20 mds.0.locker caps_tick age = 15.888847 client.4606.0x200000007d5
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:26:55.944+0000 7f47c4b31700 20 mds.0.locker caps_tick age = 20.888905 client.4606.0x200000007d5
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:27:00.944+0000 7f47c4b31700 20 mds.0.locker caps_tick age = 25.889039 client.4606.0x200000007d5
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:27:05.944+0000 7f47c4b31700 20 mds.0.locker caps_tick age = 30.889069 client.4606.0x200000007d5
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:27:10.945+0000 7f47c4b31700 20 mds.0.locker caps_tick age = 35.889172 client.4606.0x200000007d5
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:27:15.946+0000 7f47c4b31700 20 mds.0.locker caps_tick age = 40.889251 client.4606.0x200000007d5
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:27:20.945+0000 7f47c4b31700 20 mds.0.locker caps_tick age = 45.889279 client.4606.0x200000007d5
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:27:25.945+0000 7f47c4b31700 20 mds.0.locker caps_tick age = 50.889367 client.4606.0x200000007d5
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:27:30.945+0000 7f47c4b31700 20 mds.0.locker caps_tick age = 55.889374 client.4606.0x200000007d5
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:27:35.945+0000 7f47c4b31700 20 mds.0.locker caps_tick age = 60.889494 client.4606.0x200000007d5
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:27:35.945+0000 7f47c4b31700  0 log_channel(cluster) log [WRN] : client.4606 isn't responding to mclientcaps(revoke), ino 0x200000007d5 pending pAsLsXsFscr issued pAsLsXsFsxcrwb, sent 60.889494 seconds ago
./remote/smithi120/log/ceph-mds.b.log.gz:2020-09-20T16:27:35.945+0000 7f47c4b31700 20 mds.0.locker caps_tick client.4606 isn't responding to mclientcaps(revoke), ino 0x200000007d5 pending pAsLsXsFscr issued pAsLsXsFsxcrwb, sent 60.889494 seconds ago

For debugging this, I suggest looking at the messages going to each MDS from the client. Fortunately this is a ceph-fuse client so the logs are available for what it's doing. This does happen on the kernel client too. For example:

/ceph/teuthology-archive/pdonnell-2020-09-20_07:13:47-multimds-wip-pdonnell-testing-20200920.040823-distro-basic-smithi/5451482/teuthology.log


Related issues

Copied to CephFS - Backport #47990: nautilus: qa: "client.4606 isn't responding to mclientcaps(revoke), ino 0x200000007d5 pending pAsLsXsFscr issued pAsLsXsFsxcrwb, sent 60.889494 seconds ago" Resolved
Copied to CephFS - Backport #47991: octopus: qa: "client.4606 isn't responding to mclientcaps(revoke), ino 0x200000007d5 pending pAsLsXsFscr issued pAsLsXsFsxcrwb, sent 60.889494 seconds ago" Resolved

History

#1 Updated by Patrick Donnelly 4 months ago

  • Assignee set to Xiubo Li

#2 Updated by Xiubo Li 4 months ago

  • Status changed from New to In Progress

#3 Updated by Xiubo Li 4 months ago

From 5451587/remote/smithi110/log/ceph-client.1.30354.log.gz:

We can see that the client.4606 has received the revoke request and was trying to flush the dirty data to disks and the start time is "2020-09-20T16:26:35.056+0000":


2020-09-20T16:26:35.056+0000 7f55ceffd700  5 client.4606 handle_cap_grant on in 0x200000007d5 mds.0 seq 11 caps now pAsLsXsFscr was pAsLsXsFsxcrwb
2020-09-20T16:26:35.056+0000 7f55ceffd700 10 client.4606 update_inode_file_time 0x200000007d5.head(faked_ino=0 ref=5 ll_ref=3 cap_refs={4=0,1024=1,4096=0,8192=1} open={2=0,3=0} mode=100700 size=104857600/213909504 nlink=1 btime=0.000000 mtime=2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000 ctime=2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000 caps=pAsLsXsFsxcrwb(0=pAsLsXsFsxcrwb) objectset[0x200000007d5 ts 0/0 objects 25 dirty_or_tx 196608] parents=0x10000000731.head["datafile116"] 0x7f55c4063540) pAsLsXsFsxcrwb ctime 2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000 mtime 2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000
2020-09-20T16:26:35.056+0000 7f55ceffd700 10 client.4606   revocation of Fxwb
2020-09-20T16:26:35.056+0000 7f55ceffd700 15 inode.get on 0x7f55c4063540 0x200000007d5.head now 6
2020-09-20T16:26:35.056+0000 7f55ceffd700 10 client.4606 _flush 0x200000007d5.head(faked_ino=0 ref=6 ll_ref=3 cap_refs={4=0,1024=1,4096=0,8192=1} open={2=0,3=0} mode=100700 size=104857600/213909504 nlink=1 btime=0.000000 mtime=2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000 ctime=2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000 caps=pAsLsXsFscr(0=pAsLsXsFscr) objectset[0x200000007d5 ts 0/0 objects 25 dirty_or_tx 196608] parents=0x10000000731.head["datafile116"] 0x7f55c4063540)
...

But the flush finished at "2020-09-20T16:29:20.386+0000":

...
2020-09-20T16:29:20.385+0000 7f55e1046700  1 -- 172.21.15.110:0/2458736152 <== osd.6 v2:172.21.15.120:6816/34366 20171 ==== osd_op_reply(34991 200000007d5.00000005 [write 2269184~4096,write 2392064~4096] v26'11642 uv11642 ondisk = 0) v8 ==== 206+0+0 (crc 0 0 0) 0x7f55d0025db0 con 0x7f55ac005420
2020-09-20T16:29:20.386+0000 7f55cffff700 10 client.4606 _flushed 0x200000007d5.head(faked_ino=0 ref=6 ll_ref=3 cap_refs={4=0,1024=1,4096=0,8192=1} open={2=0,3=0} mode=100700 size=104857600/213909504 nlink=1 btime=0.000000 mtime=2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000 ctime=2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000 caps=pAsLsXsFscr(0=pAsLsXsFscr) objectset[0x200000007d5 ts 0/0 objects 25 dirty_or_tx 0] parents=0x10000000731.head["datafile116"] 0x7f55c4063540)
2020-09-20T16:29:20.386+0000 7f55cffff700  5 client.4606 put_cap_ref dropped last FILE_BUFFER ref on 0x200000007d5.head(faked_ino=0 ref=6 ll_ref=3 cap_refs={4=0,1024=0,4096=0,8192=0} open={2=0,3=0} mode=100700 size=104857600/213909504 nlink=1 btime=0.000000 mtime=2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000 ctime=2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000 caps=pAsLsXsFscr(0=pAsLsXsFscr) objectset[0x200000007d5 ts 0/0 objects 25 dirty_or_tx 0] parents=0x10000000731.head["datafile116"] 0x7f55c4063540)
2020-09-20T16:29:20.386+0000 7f55cffff700  5 client.4606 put_cap_ref dropped last FILE_CACHE ref on 0x200000007d5.head(faked_ino=0 ref=6 ll_ref=3 cap_refs={4=0,1024=0,4096=0,8192=0} open={2=0,3=0} mode=100700 size=104857600/213909504 nlink=1 btime=0.000000 mtime=2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000 ctime=2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000 caps=pAsLsXsFscr(0=pAsLsXsFscr) objectset[0x200000007d5 ts 0/0 objects 25 dirty_or_tx 0] parents=0x10000000731.head["datafile116"] 0x7f55c4063540)
2020-09-20T16:29:20.386+0000 7f55cffff700 10 client.4606 check_caps on 0x200000007d5.head(faked_ino=0 ref=6 ll_ref=3 cap_refs={4=0,1024=0,4096=0,8192=0} open={2=0,3=0} mode=100700 size=104857600/213909504 nlink=1 btime=0.000000 mtime=2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000 ctime=2020-09-20T16:18:26.669617+0000 caps=pAsLsXsFscr(0=pAsLsXsFscr) objectset[0x200000007d5 ts 0/0 objects 25 dirty_or_tx 0] parents=0x10000000731.head["datafile116"] 0x7f55c4063540) wanted - used Fc issued pAsLsXsFscr revoking Fxwb flags=0
2020-09-20T16:29:20.386+0000 7f55cffff700 10 client.4606  cap mds.0 issued pAsLsXsFscr implemented pAsLsXsFsxcrwb revoking Fxwb
2020-09-20T16:29:20.386+0000 7f55cffff700 10 client.4606 completed revocation of Fxwb

It took almost 165 seconds.

For this situation since the writing data to osd took too long, maybe the osds were overloaded.

#4 Updated by Xiubo Li 4 months ago

During flush the 0x200000007d5 inode, there also have many other inodes doing the flush on the same osd.6 at the same time:

...
2020-09-20T16:27:45.084+0000 7f55e1046700  1 -- 172.21.15.110:0/2458736152 <== osd.6 v2:172.21.15.120:6816/34366 17565 ==== osd_op_reply(40514 3000000024f.00000003 [write 217088~4096] v26'10430 uv10430 ondisk = 0) v8 ==== 164+0+0 (crc 0 0 0) 0x7f55d0025db0 con 0x7f55ac005420
2020-09-20T16:27:45.099+0000 7f55e1046700  1 -- 172.21.15.110:0/2458736152 <== osd.6 v2:172.21.15.120:6816/34366 17566 ==== osd_op_reply(40516 3000000020c.00000003 [write 2367488~4096] v26'10432 uv10432 ondisk = 0) v8 ==== 164+0+0 (crc 0 0 0) 0x7f55d0025db0 con 0x7f55ac005420
2020-09-20T16:27:45.137+0000 7f55e1046700  1 -- 172.21.15.110:0/2458736152 <== osd.6 v2:172.21.15.120:6816/34366 17567 ==== osd_op_reply(30880 200000007d5.00000005 [write 2215936~4096] v26'10486 uv10486 ondisk = 0) v8 ==== 164+0+0 (crc 0 0 0) 0x7f55d0025db0 con 0x7f55ac005420
2020-09-20T16:27:45.153+0000 7f55e1046700  1 -- 172.21.15.110:0/2458736152 <== osd.6 v2:172.21.15.120:6816/34366 17568 ==== osd_op_reply(42340 30000000228.00000016 [write 995328~4096,write 4153344~4096] v26'11014 uv11014 ondisk = 0) v8 ==== 206+0+0 (crc 0 0 0) 0x7f55d0025db0 con 0x7f55ac005420
2020-09-20T16:27:45.192+0000 7f55e1046700  1 -- 172.21.15.110:0/2458736152 <== osd.6 v2:172.21.15.120:6816/34366 17569 ==== osd_op_reply(42351 30000000203.00000006 [write 1839104~4096] v26'11016 uv11016 ondisk = 0) v8 ==== 164+0+0 (crc 0 0 0) 0x7f55d0025db0 con 0x7f55ac005420
2020-09-20T16:27:45.270+0000 7f55e1046700  1 -- 172.21.15.110:0/2458736152 <== osd.6 v2:172.21.15.120:6816/34366 17570 ==== osd_op_reply(36547 30000000208.0000000d [write 2760704~4096] v26'10391 uv10391 ondisk = 0) v8 ==== 164+0+0 (crc 0 0 0) 0x7f55d0025db0 con 0x7f55ac005420
2020-09-20T16:27:45.320+0000 7f55e1046700  1 -- 172.21.15.110:0/2458736152 <== osd.6 v2:172.21.15.120:6816/34366 17571 ==== osd_op_reply(40531 30000000200.00000004 [write 73728~4096] v26'10434 uv10434 ondisk = 0) v8 ==== 164+0+0 (crc 0 0 0) 0x7f55d0025db0 con 0x7f55ac005420
2020-09-20T16:27:45.356+0000 7f55e1046700  1 -- 172.21.15.110:0/2458736152 <== osd.6 v2:172.21.15.120:6816/34366 17572 ==== osd_op_reply(30881 30000000258.00000012 [write 2768896~4096] v26'10488 uv10488 ondisk = 0) v8 ==== 164+0+0 (crc 0 0 0) 0x7f55d0025db0 con 0x7f55ac005420
2020-09-20T16:27:45.356+0000 7f55e1046700  1 -- 172.21.15.110:0/2458736152 <== osd.6 v2:172.21.15.120:6816/34366 17573 ==== osd_op_reply(42360 30000000222.0000000c [write 1658880~4096] v26'11018 uv11018 ondisk = 0) v8 ==== 164+0+0 (crc 0 0 0) 0x7f55d0025db0 con 0x7f55ac005420
2020-09-20T16:27:45.412+0000 7f55e1046700  1 -- 172.21.15.110:0/2458736152 <== osd.6 v2:172.21.15.120:6816/34366 17574 ==== osd_op_reply(36553 30000000208.00000016 [write 2854912~4096] v26'10393 uv10393 ondisk = 0) v8 ==== 164+0+0 (crc 0 0 0) 0x7f55d0025db0 con 0x7f55ac005420
@@@    
...                                                                              

Too many inodes to write to the same osd.6 at the same time could make the osd.6 to be overloaded.

#5 Updated by Xiubo Li 4 months ago

@Patrick,

Maybe the MDS shouldn't report the WRN to monitor when revoking the "Fwbl" caps ? Since it may need to flush the dirty buffer to disk, which may take a longer time than 60 seonds.

#6 Updated by Patrick Donnelly 4 months ago

Xiubo Li wrote:

@Patrick,

Maybe the MDS shouldn't report the WRN to monitor when revoking the "Fwbl" caps ? Since it may need to flush the dirty buffer to disk, which may take a longer time than 60 seonds.

Okay, so the issue is that one of the OSDs was slow. That's not unusual for these tests. Is there a timeout config we can bump to say 300 seconds so this warning goes away? I do not want to ignorelist the warning.

#7 Updated by Xiubo Li 4 months ago

Patrick Donnelly wrote:

Xiubo Li wrote:

@Patrick,

Maybe the MDS shouldn't report the WRN to monitor when revoking the "Fwbl" caps ? Since it may need to flush the dirty buffer to disk, which may take a longer time than 60 seonds.

Okay, so the issue is that one of the OSDs was slow. That's not unusual for these tests. Is there a timeout config we can bump to say 300 seconds so this warning goes away? I do not want to ignorelist the warning.

This depends on the `session_timeout` value, which the default value is 60 seconds:

4145     // exponential backoff of warning intervals
4146     if (age > mds->mdsmap->get_session_timeout() * (1 << cap->get_num_revoke_warnings())) {
4147       cap->inc_num_revoke_warnings();     
4148       CachedStackStringStream css;
4149       *css << "client." << cap->get_client() << " isn't responding to mclientcaps(revoke), ino " 
4150            << cap->get_inode()->ino() << " pending " << ccap_string(cap->pending())
4151            << " issued " << ccap_string(cap->issued()) << ", sent " << age << " seconds ago"; 
4152       mds->clog->warn() << css->strv();   
4153       dout(20) << __func__ << " " << css->strv() << dendl;
4154     } else {
4155       dout(20) << __func__ << " silencing log message (backoff) for " << "client." << cap->get_client() << "." << cap->get_inode()->i     no() << dendl;
4156     }
# ./bin/ceph fs get a 
Filesystem 'a' (1)
fs_name a
epoch   125
flags   12
created 2020-09-28T17:02:27.386794+0800
modified        2020-09-30T09:17:14.772135+0800
tableserver     0
root    0
session_timeout 60
session_autoclose       300
max_file_size   1099511627776
required_client_features        {}
last_failure    0
last_failure_osd_epoch  0
compat  compat={},rocompat={},incompat={1=base v0.20,2=client writeable ranges,3=default file layouts on dirs,4=dir inode in separate object,5=mds uses versioned encoding,6=dirfrag is stored in omap,8=no anchor table,9=file layout v2,10=snaprealm v2}
max_mds 1
in      0
up      {0=4307}
failed
damaged
stopped
data_pools      [3]
metadata_pool   2
inline_data     disabled
balancer
standby_count_wanted    1
[mds.c{0:4307} state up:active seq 3190 addr [v2:10.72.37.222:6830/2699242870,v1:10.72.37.222:6831/2699242870]]

Currently AFAICK we can change this only by `fs set` command:

# ceph fs set a session_timeout 300

The 300 seconds should be fine, there also had some other similiar issues before which also could see the same logs and they all took less than 200s.

#8 Updated by Patrick Donnelly 4 months ago

Sounds good. Please write up a PR for this Xiubo.

#9 Updated by Xiubo Li 4 months ago

Patrick Donnelly wrote:

Sounds good. Please write up a PR for this Xiubo.

Sure, will do.

#10 Updated by Patrick Donnelly 4 months ago

  • Category set to Testing
  • Labels (FS) qa, qa-failure added

#11 Updated by Xiubo Li 3 months ago

  • Pull request ID set to 37629

#12 Updated by Xiubo Li 3 months ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Fix Under Review

#13 Updated by Patrick Donnelly 3 months ago

/ceph/teuthology-archive/yuriw-2020-10-07_19:13:19-multimds-wip-yuri5-testing-2020-10-07-1021-octopus-distro-basic-smithi/5504780/teuthology.log

#14 Updated by Patrick Donnelly 3 months ago

  • Backport set to octopus,nautilus

/ceph/teuthology-archive/yuriw-2020-10-07_19:13:19-multimds-wip-yuri5-testing-2020-10-07-1021-octopus-distro-basic-smithi/5504780/teuthology.log

#15 Updated by Patrick Donnelly 3 months ago

  • Status changed from Fix Under Review to Pending Backport

#16 Updated by Nathan Cutler 3 months ago

  • Copied to Backport #47990: nautilus: qa: "client.4606 isn't responding to mclientcaps(revoke), ino 0x200000007d5 pending pAsLsXsFscr issued pAsLsXsFsxcrwb, sent 60.889494 seconds ago" added

#17 Updated by Nathan Cutler 3 months ago

  • Copied to Backport #47991: octopus: qa: "client.4606 isn't responding to mclientcaps(revoke), ino 0x200000007d5 pending pAsLsXsFscr issued pAsLsXsFsxcrwb, sent 60.889494 seconds ago" added

#18 Updated by Nathan Cutler about 2 months ago

  • Status changed from Pending Backport to Resolved

While running with --resolve-parent, the script "backport-create-issue" noticed that all backports of this issue are in status "Resolved" or "Rejected".

Also available in: Atom PDF