Project

General

Profile

Feature #45747

pybind/mgr/nfs: add interface for adding user defined configuration

Added by Varsha Rao 8 months ago. Updated 5 months ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Category:
-
Target version:
% Done:

0%

Source:
Development
Tags:
Backport:
octopus
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
Component(FS):
mgr/nfs
Labels (FS):
NFS-cluster
Pull request ID:

Description

The common config in RADOS (which presently just links to each export config) should also include a user-defined configuration object. That object is not manipulated by the nfs module it is:

  • created when the nfs cluster is made
  • manipulated by a helper nfs command, maybe: "ceph nfs cluster config "NFS-block-as-string"
  • deleted when the nfs cluster is destroyed

Related issues

Copied to CephFS - Backport #46957: octopus: pybind/mgr/nfs: add interface for adding user defined configuration Resolved

History

#1 Updated by Patrick Donnelly 8 months ago

  • Subject changed from mgr/volumes/nfs: Add interface to get ganesha config from json file to mgr/nfs: Add interface to get ganesha config from json file
  • Target version set to v16.0.0
  • Source set to Development
  • Backport set to octopus
  • Component(FS) mgr/nfs added
  • Labels (FS) NFS-cluster added

#2 Updated by Varsha Rao 7 months ago

Add json ganesha config to common ganesha config rados object

#3 Updated by Patrick Donnelly 6 months ago

  • Subject changed from mgr/nfs: Add interface to get ganesha config from json file to pybind/mgr/nfs: add interface for adding user defined configuration
  • Description updated (diff)
  • Status changed from New to In Progress

#4 Updated by Varsha Rao 6 months ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Fix Under Review
  • Pull request ID set to 36351

#5 Updated by Patrick Donnelly 5 months ago

  • Status changed from Fix Under Review to Pending Backport

#6 Updated by Nathan Cutler 5 months ago

  • Copied to Backport #46957: octopus: pybind/mgr/nfs: add interface for adding user defined configuration added

#7 Updated by Sebastian Wagner 5 months ago

  • Status changed from Pending Backport to Resolved

backport pr: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/36748

Note that this is an exception. I don't plan to include volumes/nfs PRs to be included in cephadm backports. This was mainly an oversight.

Also available in: Atom PDF