Project

General

Profile

Bug #19948

LibRadosTwoPools[EC]PP.PromoteSnap

Added by Sage Weil almost 7 years ago. Updated almost 7 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Immediate
Assignee:
Category:
-
Target version:
-
% Done:

0%

Source:
Tags:
Backport:
Regression:
No
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Pull request ID:
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):

Description

2017-05-16T00:43:07.894 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.smithi055.stdout:                 api_tier: [ RUN      ] LibRadosTwoPoolsECPP.PromoteSnap
2017-05-16T00:43:07.895 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.smithi055.stdout:                 api_tier: waiting for scrub...
2017-05-16T00:43:07.895 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.smithi055.stdout:                 api_tier: done waiting
2017-05-16T00:43:07.895 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.smithi055.stdout:                 api_tier: /build/ceph-12.0.1-2399-gaf38d31/src/test/librados/TestCase.cc:383: Failure
2017-05-16T00:43:07.895 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.smithi055.stdout:                 api_tier:       Expected: 0
2017-05-16T00:43:07.896 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.smithi055.stdout:                 api_tier: To be equal to: completion->get_return_value()
2017-05-16T00:43:07.896 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.smithi055.stdout:                 api_tier:       Which is: -2
2017-05-16T00:43:07.896 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.smithi055.stdout:                 api_tier: [  FAILED  ] LibRadosTwoPoolsECPP.PromoteSnap (24339 ms)

/a/yuriw-2017-05-15_22:59:10-rados-wip-yuri-testing_2017_5_16-distro-basic-smithi/1181582
/a/sage-2017-05-15_17:07:41-rados-wip-sage-testing2---basic-smithi/1180451

History

#1 Updated by Sage Weil almost 7 years ago

/a/sage-2017-05-16_22:22:40-rados-wip-sage-testing2---basic-smithi/1186016

#2 Updated by Sage Weil almost 7 years ago

  • Subject changed from LibRadosTwoPoolsECPP.PromoteSnap to LibRadosTwoPools[EC]PP.PromoteSnap
2017-05-17T17:39:57.598 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.smithi089.stdout:                 api_tier: [ RUN      ] LibRadosTwoPoolsPP.PromoteSnap
2017-05-17T17:39:57.603 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.smithi089.stdout:                 api_tier: /build/ceph-12.0.2-1217-gc05c5f4/src/test/librados/TestCase.cc:383: Failure
2017-05-17T17:39:57.606 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.smithi089.stdout:                 api_tier:       Expected: 0
2017-05-17T17:39:57.610 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.smithi089.stdout:                 api_tier: To be equal to: completion->get_return_value()
2017-05-17T17:39:57.612 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.smithi089.stdout:                 api_tier:       Which is: -2
2017-05-17T17:39:57.616 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.smithi089.stdout:                 api_tier: [  FAILED  ] LibRadosTwoPoolsPP.PromoteSnap (11247 ms)

/a/sage-2017-05-17_15:24:19-rados-wip-sage-testing---basic-smithi/1189208

the non-ec test fails sometimes too!

#3 Updated by Sage Weil almost 7 years ago

/a/sage-2017-05-23_06:26:57-rados-wip-sage-testing---basic-smithi/1220717

#4 Updated by Sage Weil almost 7 years ago

/a/sage-2017-06-02_08:32:01-rados-wip-sage-testing-distro-basic-smithi/1255484
description: rados/thrash/{0-size-min-size-overrides/2-size-1-min-size.yaml 1-pg-log-overrides/short_pg_log.yaml
backoff/peering.yaml ceph.yaml clusters/{fixed-2.yaml openstack.yaml} d-require-luminous/at-mkfs.yaml
msgr-failures/fastclose.yaml msgr/random.yaml objectstore/filestore-xfs.yaml rados.yaml
rocksdb.yaml thrashers/pggrow.yaml workloads/rados_api_tests.yaml}

#5 Updated by Sage Weil almost 7 years ago

/a/sage-2017-06-08_20:27:41-rados-wip-sage-testing2-distro-basic-smithi/1271605
rados/thrash/{0-size-min-size-overrides/3-size-2-min-size.yaml 1-pg-log-overrides/normal_pg_log.yaml backoff/peering.yaml ceph.yaml clusters/{fixed-2.yaml openstack.yaml} d-require-luminous/at-mkfs.yaml msgr-failures/osd-delay.yaml msgr/async.yaml objectstore/bluestore.yaml rados.yaml rocksdb.yaml thrashers/morepggrow.yaml workloads/rados_api_tests.yaml}

#6 Updated by Sage Weil almost 7 years ago

This is simple fallout from the SnapSet change: if we end up with a head whiteout with clones during cleanup we get ENOENT when trying to delete it.

#7 Updated by Sage Weil almost 7 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Fix Under Review

#8 Updated by Kefu Chai almost 7 years ago

  • Status changed from Fix Under Review to Resolved
  • Assignee set to Sage Weil

Also available in: Atom PDF