https://tracker.ceph.com/https://tracker.ceph.com/favicon.ico2016-04-26T21:03:28ZCeph rgw - Bug #15618: 'period update' does not remove short_zone_ids of deleted zoneshttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15618?journal_id=695972016-04-26T21:03:28ZAbhishek Lekshmananabhishek.lekshmanan@gmail.com
<ul></ul><p>Don't we still reference the short zone ids for determining source of an object etc. will there be any effect if we end up totally removing it on zone deletion?</p> rgw - Bug #15618: 'period update' does not remove short_zone_ids of deleted zoneshttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15618?journal_id=697002016-04-28T17:10:47ZCasey Bodleycbodley@redhat.com
<ul></ul><p>As far as I can tell, there aren't any code paths that look up other zones from the period's short_zone_ids map. The only user of this map is on startup, for the current gateway to learn its own short id for RGWRados::get_zone_short_id().</p> rgw - Bug #15618: 'period update' does not remove short_zone_ids of deleted zoneshttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15618?journal_id=697012016-04-28T17:15:26ZYehuda Sadehyehuda@redhat.com
<ul></ul><p>the short zone id is stored on the objects, and serves as a tie breaker for sync</p> rgw - Bug #15618: 'period update' does not remove short_zone_ids of deleted zoneshttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15618?journal_id=697942016-04-29T20:18:38ZCasey Bodleycbodley@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>Closed</i></li></ul><p>it turns out that we do want to keep deleted zones in the period, so we can check new zones against them for hash collisions</p> rgw - Bug #15618: 'period update' does not remove short_zone_ids of deleted zoneshttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15618?journal_id=874372017-03-09T18:44:14ZCasey Bodleycbodley@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Closed</i> to <i>In Progress</i></li></ul><p>reopened after further discussion</p> rgw - Bug #15618: 'period update' does not remove short_zone_ids of deleted zoneshttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15618?journal_id=875292017-03-13T20:06:12ZCasey Bodleycbodley@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>In Progress</i> to <i>Fix Under Review</i></li></ul><p><a class="external" href="https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13949">https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/13949</a></p> rgw - Bug #15618: 'period update' does not remove short_zone_ids of deleted zoneshttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15618?journal_id=875532017-03-14T18:27:46ZCasey Bodleycbodley@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Fix Under Review</i> to <i>Pending Backport</i></li><li><strong>Backport</strong> set to <i>jewel kraken</i></li></ul> rgw - Bug #15618: 'period update' does not remove short_zone_ids of deleted zoneshttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15618?journal_id=877862017-03-21T13:03:19ZNathan Cutlerncutler@suse.cz
<ul><li><strong>Copied to</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-9 status-3 priority-4 priority-default closed" href="/issues/19341">Backport #19341</a>: jewel: 'period update' does not remove short_zone_ids of deleted zones</i> added</li></ul> rgw - Bug #15618: 'period update' does not remove short_zone_ids of deleted zoneshttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15618?journal_id=877882017-03-21T13:03:21ZNathan Cutlerncutler@suse.cz
<ul><li><strong>Copied to</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-9 status-3 priority-4 priority-default closed" href="/issues/19342">Backport #19342</a>: kraken: 'period update' does not remove short_zone_ids of deleted zones</i> added</li></ul> rgw - Bug #15618: 'period update' does not remove short_zone_ids of deleted zoneshttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/15618?journal_id=891442017-04-12T21:00:00ZNathan Cutlerncutler@suse.cz
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Pending Backport</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li></ul>