Project

General

Profile

Bug #14384

fsx failed to compile

Added by Zheng Yan almost 7 years ago. Updated almost 7 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Target version:
-
% Done:

0%

Source:
other
Tags:
Backport:
hammer,infernalis
Regression:
No
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Component(FS):
Labels (FS):
Pull request ID:
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):

Description

http://teuthology.ovh.sepia.ceph.com/teuthology/teuthology-2016-01-11_23:04:01-fs-master---basic-openstack/2232/
http://teuthology.ovh.sepia.ceph.com/teuthology/teuthology-2016-01-11_23:04:01-fs-master---basic-openstack/2272/

2016-01-12T04:05:18.644 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.target080189.stderr:fsx.c: In function 'logdump':
2016-01-12T04:05:18.645 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.target080189.stderr:fsx.c:298:3: error: unknown type name 'bool'
2016-01-12T04:05:18.645 INFO:tasks.workunit.client.0.target080189.stderr:   bool overlap;

Related issues

Copied to CephFS - Backport #14490: infernalis: fsx failed to compile Resolved
Copied to CephFS - Backport #14624: hammer: fsx failed to compile Resolved

History

#1 Updated by Greg Farnum almost 7 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Pending Backport

I sent a patch upstream and pushed a patch to the workunit in master branch so that it checks out a working commit instead. See commit:7d52372ae74878ebd001036ff0a7aad525eb15b6.

It hasn't been backported, I'm kind of hoping upstream takes that patch quickly enough we don't care, but in the (fairly likely) event that doesn't happen we should backport it...

#2 Updated by Loïc Dachary almost 7 years ago

  • Backport set to infernalis

#3 Updated by Loïc Dachary almost 7 years ago

#4 Updated by Nathan Cutler almost 7 years ago

  • Backport changed from infernalis to hammer,infernalis

#5 Updated by Nathan Cutler almost 7 years ago

#6 Updated by Loïc Dachary almost 7 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending Backport to Resolved

Also available in: Atom PDF