Project

General

Profile

Activity

From 09/24/2018 to 10/23/2018

10/23/2018

05:43 AM Bug #21057 (Resolved): ceph-fuse RPM should require fusermount
Nathan Cutler
05:42 AM Backport #35943 (Resolved): mimic: ceph-fuse RPM should require fusermount
Nathan Cutler

10/22/2018

03:39 PM Backport #35943: mimic: ceph-fuse RPM should require fusermount
Nathan Cutler wrote:
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/24037
merged
Yuri Weinstein

10/18/2018

03:10 PM Backport #36516 (Rejected): jewel: ceph-fuse RPM should require fusermount
Jewel is EOL Nathan Cutler
02:56 PM Backport #36516 (In Progress): jewel: ceph-fuse RPM should require fusermount
Nathan Cutler
02:55 PM Backport #36516 (Rejected): jewel: ceph-fuse RPM should require fusermount
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/23632 Nathan Cutler

10/10/2018

08:43 PM Backport #36392 (Resolved): mimic: No linker time hardening in ceph rpm builds
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/25171 Nathan Cutler
08:43 PM Backport #36391 (Resolved): luminous: No linker time hardening in ceph rpm builds
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/25173 Nathan Cutler
08:43 PM Bug #36316 (Pending Backport): No linker time hardening in ceph rpm builds
Nathan Cutler
12:30 PM Bug #36316 (Resolved): No linker time hardening in ceph rpm builds
Kefu Chai

10/04/2018

12:51 PM Bug #36316: No linker time hardening in ceph rpm builds
Upstream PR:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/24425
Boris Ranto
12:51 PM Bug #36316 (Resolved): No linker time hardening in ceph rpm builds
Currently, we do pass the hardened CFLAGS and CPPFLAGS when building the
code. However, we do not pass the hardened ...
Boris Ranto

09/25/2018

08:50 AM Bug #17516: aarch64: Compiler-based detection of crc32 extended CPU type is broken
New master PR: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/24168 Nathan Cutler
 

Also available in: Atom