Activity
From 06/10/2016 to 07/09/2016
07/09/2016
- 09:02 PM Fix #16645 (Resolved): libatomic-ops-devel was renamed in May 2012 - fix in ceph.spec
- There is a SUSE-only dependency on "libatomic-ops-devel" in the spec file.
In May 2012 the package was renamed to ...
07/06/2016
- 09:42 AM Bug #5194: udev does not start osd after reboot on wheezy or el6 or fedora
- ok, Nathan, thanks for the link.
- 08:58 AM Bug #5194: udev does not start osd after reboot on wheezy or el6 or fedora
- René, the Debian Jessie issue is known and is being addressed by http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16351
- 07:51 AM Bug #5194: udev does not start osd after reboot on wheezy or el6 or fedora
- I want to point out on regression in this in debian jessie. As a temporary workaround I placed the corresponding line...
- 08:07 AM Fix #16598 (Resolved): mount.ceph: move from ceph-base to ceph-common and add symlink in /sbin fo...
- In RH+derivatives, /sbin is a symlink to /usr/sbin. In SUSE, it is a separate directory.
The spec file installs @m...
06/29/2016
- 07:40 PM Bug #16522 (Fix Under Review): install-deps.sh fails on openSUSE Tumbleweed
- 01:16 PM Bug #16522: install-deps.sh fails on openSUSE Tumbleweed
- update on proposed fix: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10017
- 10:01 AM Bug #16522: install-deps.sh fails on openSUSE Tumbleweed
- proposed a fix: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10013
It might be better to base OS detection on something else ... - 09:56 AM Bug #16522 (Resolved): install-deps.sh fails on openSUSE Tumbleweed
- install-deps-sh script checks for presence of apt-get to install minimal dependecies for Debian. On Tumbleweed this t...
- 08:53 AM Backport #16099 (In Progress): jewel: ceph-base requires parted
06/28/2016
- 04:11 PM Bug #9860: grub/os-prober launch kills most ceph OSD
- I hit this issue today, and I'll probably use the suggested workaround. Surely this should affect more people? And wi...
06/24/2016
06/23/2016
- 07:14 PM Fix #14828: ceph Resource Agent does not work with systemd
- *master PR*: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/8818
- 04:29 PM Fix #14828 (Pending Backport): ceph Resource Agent does not work with systemd
- 07:12 PM Backport #16461 (Resolved): jewel: ceph Resource Agent does not work with systemd
- https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9917
- 01:48 PM Fix #16440: [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- @Nathan, okay, no problem, I'll wait until merge and update backport PRs.
- 01:28 PM Fix #16440: [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- @Vladimir: If any changes are made to https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9871 these will have to be manually reflected...
- 01:26 PM Fix #16440 (Fix Under Review): [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- 08:39 AM Fix #16440: [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9871
backport tickets and PRs:
jewel:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16441
... - 08:36 AM Fix #16440 (Resolved): [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- systemd-run logic in initscripts was introduced because of ticket http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/7627. If we have sys...
- 01:45 PM Backport #16442: hammer: [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- Thanks, Nathan, I'll cherry-pick commits from master to backport-branch after merge to master.
- 01:30 PM Backport #16442 (Need More Info): hammer: [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- Backporting note: do not process further until https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9871 has been merged and cherry-pick...
- 01:26 PM Backport #16442 (In Progress): hammer: [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- h3. original description
systemd-run logic in initscripts was introduced because of ticket http://tracker.ceph.com... - 08:41 AM Backport #16442: hammer: [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- PR:
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9873
base ticket:
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16440 - 08:38 AM Backport #16442 (Resolved): hammer: [initscripts]: systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9873
- 01:44 PM Backport #16441: jewel: [initscripts] systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- Thanks, Nathan, I'll cherry-pick commits from master to backport-branch after merge to master.
- 01:29 PM Backport #16441 (Need More Info): jewel: [initscripts] systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- Backporting note: do not process further until https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9871 has been merged and cherry-pick...
- 01:24 PM Backport #16441 (In Progress): jewel: [initscripts] systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- h3. original description
systemd-run logic in initscripts was introduced because of ticket http://tracker.ceph.com... - 08:40 AM Backport #16441: jewel: [initscripts] systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- not a bug. should be changed to fix.
PR: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9872
base ticket:
http://tracker.ceph... - 08:37 AM Backport #16441 (Resolved): jewel: [initscripts] systemd-run is not needed in initscripts
- https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9872
06/21/2016
06/17/2016
- 09:21 AM Bug #16353: rpm: drop obsolete -compat metapackages
- Backport note: #16345, #16346, and #16353 should be combined into a single backport PR to avoid merge conflicts.
- 09:21 AM Bug #16346: rpm: librgw-devel package does not depend on librgw2
- Backport note: #16345, #16346, and #16353 should be combined into a single backport PR to avoid merge conflicts.
06/16/2016
- 08:31 PM Bug #16353 (Fix Under Review): rpm: drop obsolete -compat metapackages
- *master PR*: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9757
- 08:18 PM Bug #16353 (Resolved): rpm: drop obsolete -compat metapackages
- The RPM spec file has a bunch of -compat metapackages that were put there long ago for reasons that made sense at the...
- 09:02 AM Bug #16346 (Fix Under Review): rpm: librgw-devel package does not depend on librgw2
- *master PR*: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9744
- 08:15 AM Bug #16346 (Resolved): rpm: librgw-devel package does not depend on librgw2
- Credits to the openSUSE maintainers for spotting this bug.
In the debian packaging, librgw-dev requires both libra... - 09:01 AM Bug #16345 (Fix Under Review): rpm: shared library devel packages do not follow the soname
- *master PR*: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9744
- 08:08 AM Bug #16345 (Resolved): rpm: shared library devel packages do not follow the soname
- Credits to the openSUSE maintainers for spotting this bug.
The spec file defines several shared library packages s... - 07:38 AM Bug #15725 (Resolved): rpm: SELinux relabel does not work on systems using CIL
- 07:38 AM Bug #15627 (Resolved): install-deps.sh broken on SUSE if systemd-rpm-macros not installed
- 07:38 AM Feature #15472 (Resolved): rpm: enable IB/RDMA support
- 07:38 AM Fix #15419 (Resolved): ceph-{mds,mon,osd,radosgw} systemd unit files need "wants=time-sync.target"
- 07:38 AM Fix #13445 (Resolved): ceph.spec.in: drop support for RHEL<7 and SUSE<1210 in jewel and above
- 06:35 AM Backport #15606 (Resolved): jewel: ceph-{mds,mon,osd,radosgw} systemd unit files need "wants=time...
- 06:34 AM Backport #15739 (Resolved): jewel: ceph.spec.in: drop support for RHEL<7 and SUSE<1210 in jewel a...
- 06:34 AM Backport #15742 (Resolved): jewel: rpm: enable IB/RDMA support
- 06:34 AM Backport #15744 (Resolved): jewel: rpm: SELinux relabel does not work on systems using CIL
- 06:34 AM Backport #15894 (Resolved): jewel: install-deps.sh broken on SUSE if systemd-rpm-macros not insta...
06/13/2016
- 04:13 PM Bug #16264 (Resolved): generate tarball with make_dist.sh
- There are two ways to make a Ceph release tarball:
# @make dist@, a Makefile target that creates a tarball. This i... - 08:55 AM Bug #15869 (Resolved): ceph gid mismatch on upgrade from hammer with pre-existing ceph user (SUSE)
- 08:55 AM Backport #16107 (Resolved): jewel: ceph gid mismatch on upgrade from hammer with pre-existing cep...
- 08:31 AM Bug #15984 (Fix Under Review): ceph-osd-prestart.sh contains Upstart-specific code
- *master PR*: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9667
06/11/2016
- 06:15 AM Bug #15560: Unknown lvalue 'TasksMax' in section 'Service'
- This warning is purely cosmetic. All it means is the version of systemd installed on your system is old and does not ...
06/10/2016
- 04:24 PM Bug #15560: Unknown lvalue 'TasksMax' in section 'Service'
- This issue is still present in 10.2.1 version. Is there any fix so far?
Also available in: Atom