https://tracker.ceph.com/https://tracker.ceph.com/favicon.ico2014-07-23T13:52:36ZCeph rgw - Feature #8911: RGW doesn't return 'x-timestamp' in header which is used by 'View Details' of OpenStackhttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8911?journal_id=384332014-07-23T13:52:36ZMichael Kidd
<ul></ul><p>Just to be clear, Swift does return this header and the OpenStack devs advise they only test against the Swift storage backend.</p> rgw - Feature #8911: RGW doesn't return 'x-timestamp' in header which is used by 'View Details' of OpenStackhttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8911?journal_id=386172014-07-29T09:35:34ZSage Weilsage@newdream.net
<ul><li><strong>Priority</strong> changed from <i>Normal</i> to <i>High</i></li></ul> rgw - Feature #8911: RGW doesn't return 'x-timestamp' in header which is used by 'View Details' of OpenStackhttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8911?journal_id=389292014-08-05T03:21:36ZAshish Chandramail.ashishchandra@gmail.com
<ul></ul><p>It also doesnot returns "Content-type" header as well. Swift does return this header aswell. So I would love to see radosgw returning these two headers.</p> rgw - Feature #8911: RGW doesn't return 'x-timestamp' in header which is used by 'View Details' of OpenStackhttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8911?journal_id=392432014-08-12T09:57:13ZSage Weilsage@newdream.net
<ul><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>Luis Pabon</i></li></ul> rgw - Feature #8911: RGW doesn't return 'x-timestamp' in header which is used by 'View Details' of OpenStackhttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8911?journal_id=396982014-08-19T09:20:30ZLuis Pabon
<ul></ul><p>I'll take a look. Seems like this is new functionality in RGW, not a bug, right?</p> rgw - Feature #8911: RGW doesn't return 'x-timestamp' in header which is used by 'View Details' of OpenStackhttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8911?journal_id=398682014-08-21T23:12:57ZAshish Chandramail.ashishchandra@gmail.com
<ul></ul><p>Thanks Luis... actually its a new feature request not a bug. Since we want one to one headers mapping between Swift and Ceph RadosGW, mising headers does causes issues.</p> rgw - Feature #8911: RGW doesn't return 'x-timestamp' in header which is used by 'View Details' of OpenStackhttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8911?journal_id=400022014-08-26T09:15:40ZIan Colleicolle@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Tracker</strong> changed from <i>Bug</i> to <i>Feature</i></li></ul> rgw - Feature #8911: RGW doesn't return 'x-timestamp' in header which is used by 'View Details' of OpenStackhttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8911?journal_id=413722014-09-19T06:33:01ZMichael Kidd
<ul></ul><p>Hello Luis, et al..<br /> I have a customer who's requesting status for this Feature.. They view it as a bug since it causes interop issues w/ OpenStack Havana...</p>
<p>Thanks for any details you can provide...</p> rgw - Feature #8911: RGW doesn't return 'x-timestamp' in header which is used by 'View Details' of OpenStackhttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8911?journal_id=421112014-09-30T11:17:33ZIan Colleicolle@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>In Progress</i></li></ul> rgw - Feature #8911: RGW doesn't return 'x-timestamp' in header which is used by 'View Details' of OpenStackhttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8911?journal_id=442492014-11-10T16:13:27ZSage Weilsage@newdream.net
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>In Progress</i> to <i>Pending Backport</i></li><li><strong>Backport</strong> set to <i>giant, firefly</i></li></ul> rgw - Feature #8911: RGW doesn't return 'x-timestamp' in header which is used by 'View Details' of OpenStackhttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8911?journal_id=478682015-02-10T22:08:41ZLoïc Dacharyloic@dachary.org
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Pending Backport</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li></ul> rgw - Feature #8911: RGW doesn't return 'x-timestamp' in header which is used by 'View Details' of OpenStackhttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8911?journal_id=513752015-05-06T10:40:31ZLoïc Dacharyloic@dachary.org
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Resolved</i> to <i>Pending Backport</i></li></ul><p>it looks like this has not been backport to firefly after all...</p> rgw - Feature #8911: RGW doesn't return 'x-timestamp' in header which is used by 'View Details' of OpenStackhttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8911?journal_id=514032015-05-06T13:46:50ZNathan Cutlerncutler@suse.cz
<ul></ul><ul>
<li>firefly backport <a class="external" href="https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4584">https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/4584</a></li>
</ul> rgw - Feature #8911: RGW doesn't return 'x-timestamp' in header which is used by 'View Details' of OpenStackhttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8911?journal_id=519352015-05-15T10:44:10ZNathan Cutlerncutler@suse.cz
<ul></ul><p>Has already been merged into giant:</p>
<pre><code>commit:e230fab rgw: swift GET / HEAD object returns X-Timestamp field (in giant)</code></pre> rgw - Feature #8911: RGW doesn't return 'x-timestamp' in header which is used by 'View Details' of OpenStackhttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8911?journal_id=555422015-07-25T11:51:03ZNathan Cutlerncutler@suse.cz
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Pending Backport</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li></ul>