Project

General

Profile

Actions

Bug #40284

open

kclient: evaluate/fix/add lazio support in the kernel

Added by Patrick Donnelly almost 5 years ago. Updated almost 3 years ago.

Status:
New
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Target version:
-
% Done:

0%

Source:
Tags:
Backport:
Regression:
No
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Component(FS):
kceph
Labels (FS):
Pull request ID:
Crash signature (v1):
Crash signature (v2):

Description

ceph-fuse now supports lazyio [2, #20598] but I don't believe we ever checked what needed to be done for the kernel client.

Also, I got a question from Dan @ CERN about how lazyio interacts with the page cache (or for ceph-fuse, the osdc cache). In particular, if a client 1 reads some file blocks and another client 2 updates those blocks, how does client 1 expire its page cache? Does it need to reopen the file? It seems we're missing the lazyio_propagate/lazyio_synchronize interfaces to resolve this which do exist in the Client userspace library [1], but untested (#40283).

Targeting v15.0.0 just so this ticket is visible in searches.

[1] http://www.pdsw.org/pdsw09/resources/pdsw-pnfsmpiio-hildebrand-public.pdf
[2] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/22450


Related issues 2 (1 open1 closed)

Related to CephFS - Bug #40283: qa: add testing for lazyioResolvedSidharth Anupkrishnan

Actions
Blocked by Linux kernel client - Feature #41796: fs/ceph: add lazyio propagate/synchronize supportNew

Actions
Actions #1

Updated by Patrick Donnelly almost 5 years ago

  • Related to Bug #40283: qa: add testing for lazyio added
Actions #2

Updated by Patrick Donnelly over 4 years ago

  • Target version deleted (v15.0.0)
Actions #3

Updated by Patrick Donnelly over 3 years ago

  • Assignee deleted (Zheng Yan)
Actions #4

Updated by Patrick Donnelly over 3 years ago

  • Blocked by Feature #41796: fs/ceph: add lazyio propagate/synchronize support added
Actions #5

Updated by Patrick Donnelly over 3 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
Actions #6

Updated by Patrick Donnelly almost 3 years ago

Discussing for Quincy: Jeff is against keeping this in the kernel -- we are not really using it and it's probably incompatible with ceph-fuse. Jeff says the feature is dead in the kernel because it's not really implemented.

Actions

Also available in: Atom PDF