https://tracker.ceph.com/https://tracker.ceph.com/favicon.ico2012-04-19T14:11:40ZCeph Ceph - Documentation #2271: FAQ: BTRFS vs XFShttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/2271?journal_id=97162012-04-19T14:11:40ZSage Weilsage@newdream.net
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> set to <i>v0.47</i></li><li><strong>translation missing: en.field_position</strong> set to <i>1198</i></li></ul> Ceph - Documentation #2271: FAQ: BTRFS vs XFShttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/2271?journal_id=98022012-04-23T14:19:02ZSage Weilsage@newdream.net
<ul><li><strong>Target version</strong> deleted (<del><i>v0.47</i></del>)</li></ul> Ceph - Documentation #2271: FAQ: BTRFS vs XFShttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/2271?journal_id=105002012-05-23T14:17:09ZJohn Wilkinsjowilkin@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Category</strong> deleted (<del><i>OSD</i></del>)</li><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>In Progress</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>0</i> to <i>50</i></li></ul><p><a class="external" href="http://ceph.com/docs/master/rec/filesystem/">http://ceph.com/docs/master/rec/filesystem/</a> still needs some info on how easy it is to change from XFS to btrfs.</p> Ceph - Documentation #2271: FAQ: BTRFS vs XFShttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/2271?journal_id=221292013-05-17T12:49:23ZJohn Wilkinsjowilkin@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>In Progress</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li></ul><p>This is covered here: <a class="external" href="http://ceph.com/docs/master/rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations/">http://ceph.com/docs/master/rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations/</a> and has a link from the FAQ.</p> Ceph - Documentation #2271: FAQ: BTRFS vs XFShttps://tracker.ceph.com/issues/2271?journal_id=221312013-05-17T13:21:40ZSage Weilsage@newdream.net
<ul></ul><p>Correction: btrfs is not a journaled fs. The xfs is better than ext4 for subtle desSigns reasons that are probably not worth highlighting.</p>