https://tracker.ceph.com/https://tracker.ceph.com/favicon.ico2017-09-11T05:01:49ZCeph Ceph - Bug #21336: jewel: segfault in ceph-osd --flush-journal post 18951https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21336?journal_id=987562017-09-11T05:01:49ZBrad Hubbardbhubbard@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Description</strong> updated (<a title="View differences" href="/journals/98756/diff?detail_id=95742">diff</a>)</li></ul> Ceph - Bug #21336: jewel: segfault in ceph-osd --flush-journal post 18951https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21336?journal_id=988362017-09-11T20:01:00ZNathan Cutlerncutler@suse.cz
<ul><li><strong>Tracker</strong> changed from <i>Backport</i> to <i>Bug</i></li><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>In Progress</i> to <i>Pending Backport</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> set to <i>0</i></li><li><strong>Backport</strong> set to <i>jewel</i></li><li><strong>Regression</strong> set to <i>No</i></li><li><strong>Severity</strong> set to <i>3 - minor</i></li><li><strong>Release</strong> deleted (<del><i>jewel</i></del>)</li><li><strong>Release</strong> set to <i>master</i></li></ul> Ceph - Bug #21336: jewel: segfault in ceph-osd --flush-journal post 18951https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21336?journal_id=988372017-09-11T20:01:58ZNathan Cutlerncutler@suse.cz
<ul><li><strong>Copied to</strong> <i><a class="issue tracker-9 status-3 priority-4 priority-default closed" href="/issues/21358">Backport #21358</a>: jewel: segfault in ceph-osd --flush-journal post 18951</i> added</li></ul> Ceph - Bug #21336: jewel: segfault in ceph-osd --flush-journal post 18951https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21336?journal_id=988502017-09-11T20:52:43ZNathan Cutlerncutler@suse.cz
<ul></ul><p>@Brad, I'm a little confused by this issue. Is it proposing to backport <a class="external" href="https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/16553">https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/16553</a> to jewel, or just to work around the absence of that backport?</p> Ceph - Bug #21336: jewel: segfault in ceph-osd --flush-journal post 18951https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21336?journal_id=988662017-09-11T22:35:22ZBrad Hubbardbhubbard@redhat.com
<ul></ul><p>@Nathan, The workaround is purely there as a recommendation to avoid the segfault until the issue is resolved by backporting <a class="external" href="https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/16553">https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/16553</a> which is what <a class="external" href="https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17626">https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/17626</a> is supposed to do.</p> Ceph - Bug #21336: jewel: segfault in ceph-osd --flush-journal post 18951https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21336?journal_id=988902017-09-12T07:19:41ZNathan Cutlerncutler@suse.cz
<ul><li><strong>Description</strong> updated (<a title="View differences" href="/journals/98890/diff?detail_id=95912">diff</a>)</li></ul> Ceph - Bug #21336: jewel: segfault in ceph-osd --flush-journal post 18951https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/21336?journal_id=992972017-09-18T20:22:31ZBrad Hubbardbhubbard@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Pending Backport</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li></ul>