Project

General

Profile

Bug #19745

multisite: after CreateBucket is forwarded to master, local bucket may use different value for bucket index shards

Added by Casey Bodley 8 months ago. Updated 4 months ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Target version:
-
Start date:
04/21/2017
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Source:
Tags:
Backport:
jewel, kraken
Regression:
No
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Release:
Needs Doc:
No


Related issues

Copied to rgw - Backport #19758: jewel: multisite: after CreateBucket is forwarded to master, local bucket may use different value for bucket index shards Resolved
Copied to rgw - Backport #19759: kraken: multisite: after CreateBucket is forwarded to master, local bucket may use different value for bucket index shards Resolved

History

#1 Updated by Casey Bodley 8 months ago

  • Status changed from Need Review to Pending Backport

#2 Updated by Nathan Cutler 8 months ago

  • Copied to Backport #19758: jewel: multisite: after CreateBucket is forwarded to master, local bucket may use different value for bucket index shards added

#3 Updated by Nathan Cutler 8 months ago

  • Copied to Backport #19759: kraken: multisite: after CreateBucket is forwarded to master, local bucket may use different value for bucket index shards added

#4 Updated by Kefu Chai 7 months ago

  • Status changed from Pending Backport to Need Review
  • Backport changed from jewel kraken to jewel, kraken

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/15010

per Shaha, https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/14388 is an incomplete fix. so i change the status to "needs review.

#5 Updated by Casey Bodley 7 months ago

  • Status changed from Need Review to Pending Backport

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/15010 merged, please include in backports

#6 Updated by Nathan Cutler 6 months ago

Casey Bodley wrote:

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/15010 merged, please include in backports

@Casey: That commit touches an init_bucket_index() function call. That function was added in 622f50027f3ecd3a4b057fa62c702c3b73fcfbc3 which, on the face of it, looks too complex to backport to jewel?

#7 Updated by Nathan Cutler 4 months ago

  • Status changed from Pending Backport to Resolved

Also available in: Atom PDF