Project

General

Profile

Bug #17792

leak in RGWMetaStoreEntryCR

Added by Orit Wasserman 12 months ago. Updated 9 months ago.

Status:
Duplicate
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Target version:
-
Start date:
11/03/2016
Due date:
% Done:

0%

Source:
other
Tags:
Backport:
Regression:
No
Severity:
3 - minor
Reviewed:
Affected Versions:
ceph-qa-suite:
Release:
Needs Doc:
No

Description

<error>
<unique>0x10</unique>
<tid>1</tid>
<kind>Leak_PossiblyLost</kind>
<xwhat>
<text>8 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 16 of 178</text>
<leakedbytes>8</leakedbytes>
<leakedblocks>1</leakedblocks>
</xwhat>
<stack>
<frame>
<ip>0x9874105</ip>
<obj>/usr/lib64/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so</obj>
<fn>operator new(unsigned long)</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x9B02EE9</ip>
<obj>/usr/lib64/librados.so.2.0.0</obj>
<fn>librados::Rados::aio_create_completion(void*, void ()(void, void*), void ()(void, void*))</fn>
<dir>/usr/src/debug/ceph-11.0.2/src/librados</dir>
<file>librados.cc</file>
<line>2573</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x38C5B0</ip>
<obj>/usr/bin/radosgw</obj>
<fn>RGWAioCompletionNotifier::RGWAioCompletionNotifier(RGWCompletionManager*, void*)</fn>
<dir>/usr/src/debug/ceph-11.0.2/src/rgw</dir>
<file>rgw_coroutine.cc</file>
<line>386</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x38C648</ip>
<obj>/usr/bin/radosgw</obj>
<fn>RGWCoroutinesManager::create_completion_notifier(RGWCoroutinesStack*)</fn>
<dir>/usr/src/debug/ceph-11.0.2/src/rgw</dir>
<file>rgw_coroutine.cc</file>
<line>639</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x530D9A</ip>
<obj>/usr/bin/radosgw</obj>
<fn>RGWMetaStoreEntryCR::send_request()</fn>
<dir>/usr/src/debug/ceph-11.0.2/src/rgw</dir>
<file>rgw_sync.cc</file>
<line>1012</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x38D70D</ip>
<obj>/usr/bin/radosgw</obj>
<fn>RGWSimpleCoroutine::state_send_request()</fn>
<dir>/usr/src/debug/ceph-11.0.2/src/rgw</dir>
<file>rgw_coroutine.cc</file>
<line>881</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x38FDCB</ip>
<obj>/usr/bin/radosgw</obj>
<fn>RGWSimpleCoroutine::operate()</fn>
<dir>/usr/src/debug/ceph-11.0.2/src/rgw</dir>
<file>rgw_coroutine.cc</file>
<line>859</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x38DA2D</ip>
<obj>/usr/bin/radosgw</obj>
<fn>RGWCoroutinesStack::operate(RGWCoroutinesEnv*)</fn>
<dir>/usr/src/debug/ceph-11.0.2/src/rgw</dir>
<file>rgw_coroutine.cc</file>
<line>197</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x3904F1</ip>
<obj>/usr/bin/radosgw</obj>
<fn>RGWCoroutinesManager::run(std::list<RGWCoroutinesStack*, std::allocator<RGWCoroutinesStack*> >&)</fn>
<dir>/usr/src/debug/ceph-11.0.2/src/rgw</dir>
<file>rgw_coroutine.cc</file>
<line>488</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x39129F</ip>
<obj>/usr/bin/radosgw</obj>
<fn>RGWCoroutinesManager::run(RGWCoroutine*)</fn>
<dir>/usr/src/debug/ceph-11.0.2/src/rgw</dir>
<file>rgw_coroutine.cc</file>
<line>626</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x52AAF2</ip>
<obj>/usr/bin/radosgw</obj>
<fn>RGWRemoteMetaLog::run_sync()</fn>
<dir>/usr/src/debug/ceph-11.0.2/src/rgw</dir>
<file>rgw_sync.cc</file>
<line>1997</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x42AFDC</ip>
<obj>/usr/bin/radosgw</obj>
<fn>run</fn>
<dir>/usr/src/debug/ceph-11.0.2/src/rgw</dir>
<file>rgw_sync.h</file>
<line>278</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x42AFDC</ip>
<obj>/usr/bin/radosgw</obj>
<fn>RGWMetaSyncProcessorThread::process()</fn>
<dir>/usr/src/debug/ceph-11.0.2/src/rgw</dir>
<file>rgw_rados.cc</file>
<line>2992</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x3CA9D2</ip>
<obj>/usr/bin/radosgw</obj>
<fn>RGWRadosThread::Worker::entry()</fn>
<dir>/usr/src/debug/ceph-11.0.2/src/rgw</dir>
<file>rgw_rados.cc</file>
<line>2848</line>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x14A34DC4</ip>
<obj>/usr/lib64/libpthread-2.17.so</obj>
<fn>start_thread</fn>
</frame>
<frame>
<ip>0x1620CCEC</ip>
<obj>/usr/lib64/libc-2.17.so</obj>
<fn>clone</fn>
</frame>
</stack>
</error>


Related issues

Duplicates rgw - Bug #17793: leak in RGWAsyncRadosProcessor::handle_request Resolved 11/03/2016

History

#2 Updated by Casey Bodley 12 months ago

  • Duplicates Bug #17793: leak in RGWAsyncRadosProcessor::handle_request added

#3 Updated by Nathan Cutler 9 months ago

  • Status changed from New to Resolved

#4 Updated by Nathan Cutler 9 months ago

Note that this was backported to jewel as part of the jewel backport of #18407

#5 Updated by Nathan Cutler 9 months ago

  • Status changed from Resolved to Duplicate

Also available in: Atom PDF