https://tracker.ceph.com/https://tracker.ceph.com/favicon.ico2015-06-12T08:39:11ZCeph Ceph - Bug #11793: test: rados.py does not do cache_(evict|flush|try_flush) since it leaves out the cache_https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11793?journal_id=534612015-06-12T08:39:11ZZhiqiang Wangwonzhq@hotmail.com
<ul></ul><p>This is what I see from the log for oid plana9327095-291:</p>
<p>1. At first, pool 2 is the cache pool of pool 1. For plana9327095-291, osd.5 is the primary cache osd, osd.4 is the primary base osd<br />2. Some ops are done on plana9327095-291<br />3. A cache-evict op evicts plana9327095-291 from cache pool<br />4. The cache relationship is removed<br />5. A cache-flush op on plana9327095-291 is sent to osd.4. However, the pool of this op is still 2. The op can't find an object with oid plana9327095-291 and pool id 2, and returns.<br />6. A later read op on plana9327095-291 is sent to osd.4. Again, the pool is 2. Read returns with ENOENT.</p>
<p>I think the bug here is that after removing the cache relationship, the pool id of the object locater of the later ops is not updated to the base pool, it's still the cache pool.</p> Ceph - Bug #11793: test: rados.py does not do cache_(evict|flush|try_flush) since it leaves out the cache_https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11793?journal_id=774662016-08-25T17:44:21ZSamuel Justsjust@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Assignee</strong> deleted (<del><i>Samuel Just</i></del>)</li></ul> Ceph - Bug #11793: test: rados.py does not do cache_(evict|flush|try_flush) since it leaves out the cache_https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11793?journal_id=890642017-04-12T17:06:45ZSage Weilsage@newdream.net
<ul><li><strong>Priority</strong> changed from <i>High</i> to <i>Urgent</i></li></ul> Ceph - Bug #11793: test: rados.py does not do cache_(evict|flush|try_flush) since it leaves out the cache_https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11793?journal_id=890652017-04-12T17:07:01ZGreg Farnumgfarnum@redhat.com
<ul><li><strong>Subject</strong> changed from <i>rados.py does not do cache_(evict|flush|try_flush) since it leaves out the cache_</i> to <i>test: rados.py does not do cache_(evict|flush|try_flush) since it leaves out the cache_</i></li></ul> Ceph - Bug #11793: test: rados.py does not do cache_(evict|flush|try_flush) since it leaves out the cache_https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11793?journal_id=939502017-06-28T15:52:29ZSage Weilsage@newdream.net
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>12</i></li><li><strong>Priority</strong> changed from <i>Urgent</i> to <i>Immediate</i></li></ul><p>verify whether this is still the case</p> Ceph - Bug #11793: test: rados.py does not do cache_(evict|flush|try_flush) since it leaves out the cache_https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11793?journal_id=947032017-07-07T16:40:44ZSage Weilsage@newdream.net
<ul><li><strong>Priority</strong> changed from <i>Immediate</i> to <i>Urgent</i></li></ul> Ceph - Bug #11793: test: rados.py does not do cache_(evict|flush|try_flush) since it leaves out the cache_https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11793?journal_id=947042017-07-07T16:42:23ZSage Weilsage@newdream.net
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>12</i> to <i>In Progress</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>Sage Weil</i></li></ul> Ceph - Bug #11793: test: rados.py does not do cache_(evict|flush|try_flush) since it leaves out the cache_https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11793?journal_id=948142017-07-10T16:47:35ZSage Weilsage@newdream.net
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>In Progress</i> to <i>Fix Under Review</i></li></ul><p><a class="external" href="http://pulpito.ceph.com/sage-2017-07-09_19:43:05-rados:thrash-wip-11793-distro-basic-smithi/">http://pulpito.ceph.com/sage-2017-07-09_19:43:05-rados:thrash-wip-11793-distro-basic-smithi/</a></p>
<p>100%, except for one unrelated bluestore crash.</p> Ceph - Bug #11793: test: rados.py does not do cache_(evict|flush|try_flush) since it leaves out the cache_https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11793?journal_id=948832017-07-11T18:01:50ZSage Weilsage@newdream.net
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Fix Under Review</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li></ul>